最新消息: USBMI致力于为网友们分享Windows、安卓、IOS等主流手机系统相关的资讯以及评测、同时提供相关教程、应用、软件下载等服务。

英语故事-Winston Churchill

IT圈 admin 33浏览 0评论

2024年2月28日发(作者:将采文)

英语故事

Winston Churchill

丘吉尔——才华横溢、精力充沛的多面手,英国精神的化身

Winston ChurchillWinston Churchill came of a military dynasty.

His ancestor John Churchill had been created first Duke of

Marlborough in 1702 for his victories against Louis XIV early

in the War of the Spanish Succession. Churchill was born in

1874 in Blenheim Palace, the house built by the nation for

Marlborough. As a young man of undistinguished academic

accomplishment — he was admitted to Sandhurst after two

failed attempts — he entered the army as a cavalry officer.

He took enthusiastically to soldiering (and perhaps even more

enthusiastically to regimental polo playing) between 1895 and

1898. Even at 24, Churchill was steely: “I never felt the

slightest nervousness,” he wrote to his mother. “I felt as

cool as I do now.” In Cuba he was present as a war correspondent,

and in India and the Sudan he was present as both a war

correspondent and as a serving officer. Thus he revealed two

other aspects of his character: a literary bent and an interest

in public affairs.

He was to write all his life. His life of Marlborough

is one of the great English biographies, and The History of

the Second World War helped win him a Nobel Prize for literature.

Writing, however, never fully engaged his energies. Politics

consumed him. His father Lord Randolph Churchill was a

brilliant political failure. Early in life, Winston determined

to succeed where his father had failed. His motives were

twofold. His father had despised him. Writing in August 1893

to Winston’s grandmother, the dowager Duchess of Marlborough,

he said the boy lacked “cleverness, knowledge and any capacity

for settled work. He has a great talent for show-off,

exaggeration and make-believe”. His disapproval surly stung,

but Churchill reacted by venerating his father’s memory.

Winston fought to restore his father’s honor in Parliament

(where it had been dented by the Conservative Party).

Churchill entered Parliament in 1901 at age 26. In 1904

he left the Conservative Party to join the Liberals, in part

out of calculation: the Liberals were the coming party, and

in its ranks he soon achieved high office. He became First Lord

of the Admiralty in 1911. Thus it was as political head of the

Royal Navy at the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 that

he stepped onto the world stage.

A passionate believer in the navy’s historic strategic

role, he immediately committed the Royal Naval division to an

intervention in the Flanders campaign in 1914. Frustrated by

the stalemate in Belgium and France, he initiated the Allies’

only major effort to outflank the Germans on the Western Front

by sending the navy, and later a large force of the army, to

the Mediterranean. At Gallipoli in 1915, this Anglo-French

force struggled to break the defenses that blocked access to

Black Sea. It was a heroic failure that forced Churchill’s

resignation and led to his political eclipse.

It was effectively to last nearly 25 years. Despite his

readmission to office in 1917, he failed to reestablish the

reputation as a future national statesman he had won before

the war. In 1924, Churchill rejoined the Conservatives. The

Conservative Prime Minister appointed him Chancellor of the

Exchequer, but when he returned the country to the gold

standard, it proved financially disastrous, and he further

weakened his political position by opposing measures to grant

India limited self-government. He resigned office in 1931 and

entered what appeared to be a terminal political decline.

Churchill was truly a romantic, but also truly a democrat.

He had returned to gold standard, for instance, because of

romantic reasons, Britain’s status as a great financial power.

He had opposed limited self-government for India because of

equally romantic reasons, Britain’s imperial history. It was

to prove more important that as a democrat, he was disgusted

by the rise of totalitarianism in Europe. By supporting

anti-Nazi policies in his wilderness years between 1933 and

1939, he ensured that when the moment of final confrontation

between Britain and Hitler came in 1940, he stood out as the

one man in whom the nation could place its trust. He was against

the prewar appeasement policies of the Conservative leaders

Baldwin and Chamberlain. When Chamberlain lost the confidence

of Parliament, Churchill was installed in the premiership.

His was a bleak inheritance. Following the total defeat

of France, Britain truly, in his words, “stood alone.” It

had no real allies and, for much of 1940, lay under threat of

German invasion and under constant German air attack. He

nevertheless refused Hitler’s offers of peace, organized a

successful air defense that led to the victory of the Battle

of Britain and meanwhile sent most of what remained of the

British army, after its escape from the humiliation of Dunkirk,

to the Middle East to oppose Hitler’s Italian ally, Mussolini.

This was one of the boldest strategic decisions in

history. Convinced that Hitler could not invade Britain while

the Royal Navy and its protecting Royal Air Force remained

intact, he sent the army to a remote theater of war to open

a second front against the Nazi alliance. Its victories against

Mussolini during 1940-1941 both humiliated and infuriated

Hitler, while its intervention in Greece, to oppose Hitler’s

invasion of the Balkans, disrupted the Nazi dictator’s plans

to conclude German conquests in Europe by defeating Russia.

Churchill’s tendency to conduct strategy by impulse

infuriated his advisers. His chief of staff Alan Brooke

complained that every day Churchill had 10 ideas, only one of

which was good — and he did not know which one. Yet Churchill

the romantic showed acute realism in his reaction to Russia’s

predicament. He reviled communism. Required to accept a

communist ally in a struggle against a Nazi enemy, he did so

not only willingly but generously. He sent a large proportion

of Britain’s war production to Russia by Arctic convoys, even

at a time when the convoys from America to Britain suffered

devastating U-boat attacks.

From the outset of his premiership, Churchill, half

American by birth, had rested his hope of ultimate victory in

U.S. intervention. He had established a personal relationship

with President Roosevelt, that he hoped would flower into a

war-winning alliance. Roosevelt’s reluctance to commit the

U.S. to join in the war did not dent his optimism. He always

hoped events would work his way. The decision by Japan,

Hitler’s ally, to attack American Pacific fleet at Pearl

Harbor on Dec.7, 1941, justified his hopes. That evening he

confided to himself, “So we had won after all.”

America’s entry into the Second World War marked the

high point of Churchill’s statesmanship. Britain

demographically, industrially and financially, had entered

the war weaker than either of its eventual allies, the Soviet

Union and the U.S. However, the prestige Britain had won as

Hitler’s only enemy allowed Churchill to sustain parity of

leadership in the anti-Nazi alliance with Roosevelt and

Stalin.

Churchill was understandably exulted in the success of

the D-day invasion when it came in 1944. By then it was the

Russo-American rather than the Anglo-American nexus, however,

that dominated the alliance, as he ruefully recognized at the

last Big Three conference in February 1945. Shortly afterward

he suffered the domestic humiliation of losing the general

election and with it the premiership. He was to return to power

in 1951 and remain until April 1955, when ill health and visibly

failing powers caused him to resign.

It would have been kinder to his reputation had he not

returned. He was not an effective peacetime Prime Minister.

His name had been made, and he stood unchallengeable, as the

greatest of all Britain’s war leaders. It was not only his

own country, though, that owed him a debt. So too did the world

of free men and women to whom he had made a constant and

inclusive appeal in his magnificent speeches from embattled

Britain in 1940 and 1941.

2024年2月28日发(作者:将采文)

英语故事

Winston Churchill

丘吉尔——才华横溢、精力充沛的多面手,英国精神的化身

Winston ChurchillWinston Churchill came of a military dynasty.

His ancestor John Churchill had been created first Duke of

Marlborough in 1702 for his victories against Louis XIV early

in the War of the Spanish Succession. Churchill was born in

1874 in Blenheim Palace, the house built by the nation for

Marlborough. As a young man of undistinguished academic

accomplishment — he was admitted to Sandhurst after two

failed attempts — he entered the army as a cavalry officer.

He took enthusiastically to soldiering (and perhaps even more

enthusiastically to regimental polo playing) between 1895 and

1898. Even at 24, Churchill was steely: “I never felt the

slightest nervousness,” he wrote to his mother. “I felt as

cool as I do now.” In Cuba he was present as a war correspondent,

and in India and the Sudan he was present as both a war

correspondent and as a serving officer. Thus he revealed two

other aspects of his character: a literary bent and an interest

in public affairs.

He was to write all his life. His life of Marlborough

is one of the great English biographies, and The History of

the Second World War helped win him a Nobel Prize for literature.

Writing, however, never fully engaged his energies. Politics

consumed him. His father Lord Randolph Churchill was a

brilliant political failure. Early in life, Winston determined

to succeed where his father had failed. His motives were

twofold. His father had despised him. Writing in August 1893

to Winston’s grandmother, the dowager Duchess of Marlborough,

he said the boy lacked “cleverness, knowledge and any capacity

for settled work. He has a great talent for show-off,

exaggeration and make-believe”. His disapproval surly stung,

but Churchill reacted by venerating his father’s memory.

Winston fought to restore his father’s honor in Parliament

(where it had been dented by the Conservative Party).

Churchill entered Parliament in 1901 at age 26. In 1904

he left the Conservative Party to join the Liberals, in part

out of calculation: the Liberals were the coming party, and

in its ranks he soon achieved high office. He became First Lord

of the Admiralty in 1911. Thus it was as political head of the

Royal Navy at the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 that

he stepped onto the world stage.

A passionate believer in the navy’s historic strategic

role, he immediately committed the Royal Naval division to an

intervention in the Flanders campaign in 1914. Frustrated by

the stalemate in Belgium and France, he initiated the Allies’

only major effort to outflank the Germans on the Western Front

by sending the navy, and later a large force of the army, to

the Mediterranean. At Gallipoli in 1915, this Anglo-French

force struggled to break the defenses that blocked access to

Black Sea. It was a heroic failure that forced Churchill’s

resignation and led to his political eclipse.

It was effectively to last nearly 25 years. Despite his

readmission to office in 1917, he failed to reestablish the

reputation as a future national statesman he had won before

the war. In 1924, Churchill rejoined the Conservatives. The

Conservative Prime Minister appointed him Chancellor of the

Exchequer, but when he returned the country to the gold

standard, it proved financially disastrous, and he further

weakened his political position by opposing measures to grant

India limited self-government. He resigned office in 1931 and

entered what appeared to be a terminal political decline.

Churchill was truly a romantic, but also truly a democrat.

He had returned to gold standard, for instance, because of

romantic reasons, Britain’s status as a great financial power.

He had opposed limited self-government for India because of

equally romantic reasons, Britain’s imperial history. It was

to prove more important that as a democrat, he was disgusted

by the rise of totalitarianism in Europe. By supporting

anti-Nazi policies in his wilderness years between 1933 and

1939, he ensured that when the moment of final confrontation

between Britain and Hitler came in 1940, he stood out as the

one man in whom the nation could place its trust. He was against

the prewar appeasement policies of the Conservative leaders

Baldwin and Chamberlain. When Chamberlain lost the confidence

of Parliament, Churchill was installed in the premiership.

His was a bleak inheritance. Following the total defeat

of France, Britain truly, in his words, “stood alone.” It

had no real allies and, for much of 1940, lay under threat of

German invasion and under constant German air attack. He

nevertheless refused Hitler’s offers of peace, organized a

successful air defense that led to the victory of the Battle

of Britain and meanwhile sent most of what remained of the

British army, after its escape from the humiliation of Dunkirk,

to the Middle East to oppose Hitler’s Italian ally, Mussolini.

This was one of the boldest strategic decisions in

history. Convinced that Hitler could not invade Britain while

the Royal Navy and its protecting Royal Air Force remained

intact, he sent the army to a remote theater of war to open

a second front against the Nazi alliance. Its victories against

Mussolini during 1940-1941 both humiliated and infuriated

Hitler, while its intervention in Greece, to oppose Hitler’s

invasion of the Balkans, disrupted the Nazi dictator’s plans

to conclude German conquests in Europe by defeating Russia.

Churchill’s tendency to conduct strategy by impulse

infuriated his advisers. His chief of staff Alan Brooke

complained that every day Churchill had 10 ideas, only one of

which was good — and he did not know which one. Yet Churchill

the romantic showed acute realism in his reaction to Russia’s

predicament. He reviled communism. Required to accept a

communist ally in a struggle against a Nazi enemy, he did so

not only willingly but generously. He sent a large proportion

of Britain’s war production to Russia by Arctic convoys, even

at a time when the convoys from America to Britain suffered

devastating U-boat attacks.

From the outset of his premiership, Churchill, half

American by birth, had rested his hope of ultimate victory in

U.S. intervention. He had established a personal relationship

with President Roosevelt, that he hoped would flower into a

war-winning alliance. Roosevelt’s reluctance to commit the

U.S. to join in the war did not dent his optimism. He always

hoped events would work his way. The decision by Japan,

Hitler’s ally, to attack American Pacific fleet at Pearl

Harbor on Dec.7, 1941, justified his hopes. That evening he

confided to himself, “So we had won after all.”

America’s entry into the Second World War marked the

high point of Churchill’s statesmanship. Britain

demographically, industrially and financially, had entered

the war weaker than either of its eventual allies, the Soviet

Union and the U.S. However, the prestige Britain had won as

Hitler’s only enemy allowed Churchill to sustain parity of

leadership in the anti-Nazi alliance with Roosevelt and

Stalin.

Churchill was understandably exulted in the success of

the D-day invasion when it came in 1944. By then it was the

Russo-American rather than the Anglo-American nexus, however,

that dominated the alliance, as he ruefully recognized at the

last Big Three conference in February 1945. Shortly afterward

he suffered the domestic humiliation of losing the general

election and with it the premiership. He was to return to power

in 1951 and remain until April 1955, when ill health and visibly

failing powers caused him to resign.

It would have been kinder to his reputation had he not

returned. He was not an effective peacetime Prime Minister.

His name had been made, and he stood unchallengeable, as the

greatest of all Britain’s war leaders. It was not only his

own country, though, that owed him a debt. So too did the world

of free men and women to whom he had made a constant and

inclusive appeal in his magnificent speeches from embattled

Britain in 1940 and 1941.

发布评论

评论列表 (0)

  1. 暂无评论