2024年5月22日发(作者:宁清卓)
动 物 学 研 究 2008,Jun. 29(3):335—345 CN 53-1040/Q ISSN 0254-5853
Zoological Research DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.03335
Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique
NIU Yi-dong
1,*
, LIANG Shu-long
2
(1. Laboratory Animal Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China;
2. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100083, China)
Abstract: The retroviral vector (RCAS) has been widely used in avian system to study development and diseases, but
is not suitable for mammals which do not produce the retrovirus receptor TVA. In this review, we trace the current uses of
RCAS-TVA approach in mammalian system with improved strategies, including generation of tv-a transgenic mice, use of
soluble TVA receptor and retroviral receptor-ligand fusion proteins, improvement of RCAS vectors, and compare a series
of mammalian models in variant studies of gene function, development, oncogenesis and gene therapy. All those studies
demonstrate that the RCAS-TVA based mammalian models are powerful tools for understanding the mechanisms and
target treating of human diseases.
Key words: RCAS vector; TVA; Specific promoter; Transgenic animal; Mammalian model
基于RCAS-TVA技术的哺乳动物模型
牛屹东
1,*
,梁蜀龙
2
(1.北京大学人民医院实验动物中心,北京 100044;2.北京大学基础医学院,北京 100083)
摘要:近年来,鸟类逆转录病毒载体(RCAS)及其受体(TVA)系统在哺乳动物转基因模型中得到广泛应用。
本文对转tv-a基因小鼠的制备、特异性启动子选择、RCAS载体的改进等方面进行综述,展示近来RCAS-TVA系
统在哺乳动物所取得的成果,并对RCAS-TVA基因转移技术的应用前景作一展望。
关键词:RCAS载体;TVA;特异性启动子;转基因动物;哺乳动物模型
中图分类号:Q812; Q78 文章标识码:A 文章编号:0254-5853-(2008)03-0335-011
Retroviruses are enveloped viruses possessing a
RNA genome, and replicate via a DNA intermediate.
They rely on the enzyme, reverse transcriptase, to
perform the reverse transcription of their genomes from
RNA into DNA, which can then be integrated into the
host's genome. The viruses then replicate as part of the
cell's DNA (/wiki/Retrovirus). So
they have the ability to introduce new genetic
information into the chromosomes of target cells, and
serve as vehicles for transfer of exogenes (Orsulic, 2002).
To date, retroviral vectors have been wildly developed to
study gene function and therapy, developmental
Received date:2008-01-17; Accepted date:2008-03-28
processes, oncogenesis, and so forth (Logan & Tabin,
1998; Hu & Pathak, 2000; Barton & Medzhitov, 2002;
Kawakami et al, 2003; Pao et al, 2003; Harpavat &
Cepko, 2006; Du & Li, 2007). Among those retroviruses,
the avian sarcoma-leukosis virus-A (ASLV-A)-derived
vector called RCAS (Replication Competent ASLV long
terminal repeat with Splice acceptor) is used most
extensively in avian system, because high titer viral
stocks can be harvested in avian cells without helper
components. RCAS vectors are derived from the SR-A
strain of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) by deleting the src
oncogene with a multi-cloning site where exogenes can
Foundation item: Supported by Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Foundation (RDB2007-03)
收稿日期:2008-01-17; 接受日期:2008-03-28
基金项目:北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDB2007-03)
*
通讯作者(Corresponding author),Tel: 86-10-88325990, E-mail: niuyd07@
336 Zoological Research Vol. 29
be inserted (Hughes & Kosik, 1984; Hughes et al, 1987;
Petropoulos & Hughes, 1991; Boerkoel et al, 1993). The
multi-cloning site can stably accommodate inserts up to
2.5
kb (Fig. 1). Expression of the inserted genes can be
driven by either the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) or
an appropriate internal promoter (Petropoulos et al, 1992;
Du et al, 2006). A loss-of-function method, RCAS-RNAi
(RNA interference) technique, has been verified to be
efficient in “knocking down” the specific genes in
avian developing craniofacial tissues, the limb bud,
dorsal root ganglion, and the retina (Kawakami et al,
2003; Pekarik et al, 2003; Harpavat & Cepko, 2006).
Fig. 1 Constructs of the RSV and RCAS vector
The diagrams show the organization of viral DNA genomes and the
location of genes (gag, pol, env, and src) and long terminal repeat
(LTR). The src oncogene of RSV carries a splice acceptor (SA), which
is retained in RCAS. The src oncogene has been deleted and replaced
by a multi-cloning site in RCAS vector.
However, RCAS vectors can not be used in
mammalian system directly without any improvement on
the mammalian cells, which do not express the surface
receptors for virus entry and infection. TVA, a member
of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor family, is
encoded by the tv-a gene and acts as the receptor for
ASLV-A in avian cells (Bates et al, 1993; Young et al,
1993). mRNA transcribed from the tv-a gene is
alternatively spliced to produce at least two proteins, a
transmembrane and a GPI-anchored isoform (Bates et al,
1993). The mammalian cells are able to be infected and
allow for genome integration by ASLV-A or RCAS virus
if the cells are engineered to express TVA ectopically on
the surface, and both of the isoforms are sufficient to
permit infection of mammalian cells (Bates et al, 1993;
Young et al, 1993).
Compared with the general mammalian counterparts,
RCAS vectors can be constructed to encode all of the
proteins required for assembly of infectious particles in
addition to the transferred gene of interest, so they do not
require helper cells (Hughes et al, 1987; Petropoulos &
Hughes, 1991; Boerkoel et al, 1993). High-titer viral
stocks can be produced in avian cells (Himly et al, 1998;
Schaefer-Klein et al, 1998). Viral proteins are
inefficiently produced in mammalian cells, so the vectors
can not spread from the target animals and cell-to-cell
spreading within any individual is also prevented (Wills
et al, 1989; Berberich et al, 1990). The lack of viral
proteins also decreases the immune response by the host
(Pinto et al, 2000). Furthermore, the most specific
advantage of RCAS vectors is that multiple genes can be
transferred sequentially into the target cells of a single
transgenic animal (Federspiel et al, 1994; Holland et al,
1998; Murphy & Leavitt, 1999). This feature should be
attributed to the sufficient supplement of TVA receptor
which is not blocked by the poorly expressed viral
envelope protein in mammalian cells. Recent
experiments indicate that the RCAS vectors have the
ability to infect non-dividing mammalian cells, including
the primary neurons, although there is no direct evidence
(Hatziioannou & Goff, 2001; Katz et al, 2002; Greger et
al, 2004). The procedure to generate a RCAS-TVA based
model is shown in Fig. 2.
Some potential limitations for using the RCAS-TVA
system, however, should be given close attention. Target
cells, tissues and organs must express the receptor TVA.
Therefore, it is crucial to generate TVA transgenic
animals before RCAS infection. RCAS can only
accommodate an insert of less than 3
kb, but this
limitation can be partially overcome by using
pseudotyped vectors. The MLV (moloney murine
leukemia virus), carrying capacity of insert up to 6-7
kb,
has been efficiently pseudotyped with ASLV envelope
protein (Soneoka et al, 1995; Murphy & Leavitt, 1999).
But, integration site of viral DNA can not be controlled.
Efficiency of infection is dependent on the accessibility
of the organ and the proliferation rate of target cells.
Description of various advantages and limitations of
using the RCAS-TVA system has been reviewed in detail
by Orsulic (2002).
1 Transgenic mammals expressing TVA
molecules
1.1 Choice of specific promoters
The key element to produce tv-a transgenic animals
is the tissue-specific and the lineage-specific promoters
which decide specific expression of TVA in target cells,
tissues and organs. Therefore, a nucleotide fragment
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 337
consisting of the tv-a cDNA and a proper promoter must
be constructed before RCAS infection. The specific
promoters currently used to drive expression of tv-a gene
in mammalian system are summarized in Tab. 1.
338 Zoological Research Vol. 29
Fig. 2 Schematic drawing of the RCAS-TVA technique in mammalian system
A: The target mammalian somatic cells are engineered to express TVA receptor under a tissue-specific promoter and therefore are
susceptible to virus infection. B: Avian cells are transfected with a plasmid encoding the replication-competent, avian viral vector RCAS
which contains the viral genes, gag, pol and env and a gene of interest (X gene). The viruses are produced in high titer and can infect
avian cells again through the TVA receptors on the surface of cells. C: The mammalian cells expressing TVA are infected by RCAS
vectors, and only the protein encoded by X gene is efficiently produced. Because very little viral proteins are produced, no infectious
RCAS are replicated in mammalian cells. Therefore, the TVA receptors can be used repeatedly with different vectors. The neighbor cells
can not be infected by RCAS because of their deficiency of TVA receptor. D: The target cells transfected with the genes of interest will
show different destinies, such as proliferating or dying.
Tab. 1 Summary of the target cells, tissues and organs expressing TVA and
promoters used to drive expression of tv-a in mammalian system
Target Promoter/contex
Bone
Brain
Hematopoietic cell
Liver
Lung
Mammary epithelial cell culture
Mammary gland
MEFs
Most or all tissues
Neural crest cell
Ovary
Pancreas
RK3E cell line
Skeletal muscle and heart
Vascular endothelium
BSP
GFAP
nestin
GP-Ibα
albumin
SPC
MACT
MMTV
β-actin
β-actin
TRP2
β-actin , keratin
elastase I
CMV
α-actin
Tie2
Reference
Li et al, 2005
Holland & Varmus, 1998; Yamashita et al, 2006
Holland et al, 1998
Murphy & Leavitt, 1999
Lewis et al, 2005
Fisher et al, 1999
Phillips et al, 2006
Du et al, 2006
Pao et al, 2003
Federspiel et al, 1996
Fisher et al., 1999
Orsulic et al, 2002; Xing & Orsulic, 2005
Kruse et al, 1993; Lewis et al, 2003
Fu et al, 2005
Federspiel et al, 1994
Montaner et al, 2003
BSP, bone sialoprotein; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GP, glycoprotein;
MACT, mouse β-actin; MEFs, murine embryonic fibroblasts; MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; RK3E,
rat kidney epithelial cell line; SPC, surfactant protein-C; TRP2, tyrosinase-related protein-2.
Additionally, numerous studies have indicated that
some other promoters, including the ovary specific
promoter (OSP1) and the high-affinity folate receptors
promoter (HAFR) (Godwin et al, 1995; Goldsmith et al,
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 339
1999), the modified rat probasin (rPB) promoters
(Furuhata et al, 2003), and the neuroactive peptide
cholecystokinin (CCK) promoter (Chhatwal et al, 2007),
are of potential value for tissue specific expression of the
tv-a gene.
1.2 Both isoforms of TVA molecule are sufficient for
acceptance of the RCAS vectors
As mentioned earlier, two isoforms, a
1999; Fisher et al, 1999).
However, the microinjection method has some
potential limitations: 1. limited success in producing
transgenic animals of larger species; 2. requirement of
special equipment for DNA microinjection and high
technical skills; 3. labor intensive. The new mean has
been developed by using sperm cells, including
spermatogonia, as the vehicle to deliver exogenous DNA
transmembrane and a GPI-linked one, have been
identified. In the current tv-a transgenic mice, the
GPI-anchored isoform is commonly used (Federspiel et
al, 1996; Holland et al, 1998; Du et al, 2006), but the
transmembrane isoform has also be used successfully in
the study of Murphy & Leavitt (1999). Therefore, both
isoforms can accept the RCAS vectors although the
physiological functions have not been determined.
1.3 Gene transfer methods
The most widely used method to generate transgenic
animals is to microinject foreign DNA into the
pronucleus of a fertilized egg. Pronuclear microinjection
is conceptually straightforward, although it demands
special equipment and technical skill, and has the
additional feature that any cloned DNA can be used
(Palmiter & Brinster, 1986). The primary mammalian
model based on the RCAS-TVA approach was developed
in transgenic mice expressing TVA specifically in muscle
cells. They were generated by microinjecting a
nucleotide fragment consisting of the tv-a cDNA and
chicken α-actin promoter fragment into fertilized mice
eggs (Federspiel et al, 1994). Subsequently, Holland et al.
generated mice expressing TVA on the surface of glial
cells by microinjection of Gtv-a transgene, which is a 2.2
kb fragment of the GFAP promoter driving expression of
the quail tv-a cDNA and a fragment from the mouse
protamine gene (MP-1) supplying an intron and signal
for polyadenylation (Holland et al, 1998, 2000). Using
the microinjection method, then, tv-a transgenic mice
were extensively created to accept RCAS vectors in
cancer models of mammary, ovary, pancreas, liver, lung,
brain, vascular endothelium, melanoma, and other cell
types (Korfhagen et al, 1990; Holland & Varmus, 1998;
Holland et al, 1998; Fisher et al, 1999; Orsulic et al,2002;
Montaner et al, 2003; Lewis et al, 2003, 2005; Pao et al,
2003; Fu et al, 2005; Du et al, 2006) and development
models, including neuron, hemapoietic cell lines, and
other organs (Doetsch et al, 1999; Murphy & Leavitt,
into oocytes, and is therefore called “sperm-mediated
gene transfer” (SMGT, Lavitrano et al, 1989). Based on
SMGT, transgenic rats (Hamra et al, 2002; Orwig et al,
2002), pigs (Honaramooz et al, 2002) and goats
(Honaramooz et al, 2003) have now been produced. As
the improved method of SMGT, testis-mediated gene
transfer (TMGT) has been demonstrated to be practical
in delivering foreign DNA directly into the interstitial
space of adult mammalian testes (Fig. 3A), and then the
exogenous DNA is transmitted to oocytes via fertilization
(Sato et al, 1999; Sato & Nakamura, 2004). Recently, He
et al (2006) further indicated that transgenic efficiency of
TMGT was very high in both F1 and F2 mice offspring
(41% and 37% respectively), and that TMGT was
suitable for creating transgenic animals. The TMGT
technique is very simple and convenient. A needle, a
plastic disposal syringe, and a dissecting microscope are
sufficient for delivery of DNA. The TMGT technique
opens a new perspective for generating tv-a transgenic
mammals (Fig. 3B), although it requires further
improvement.
More recently, Yang et al (2007) established a rapid
procedure for obtaining transgenic mice by directly
injecting exogenes into the ovaries of fertile mice, called
ovary mediated gene transfer (OMGT). After natural
fertilization, healthy transgenic mice were obtained, and
the introduced foreign gene was inherited by F1
offspring (64.9%) and transmitted to F2 progeny
(66.94%) stably. The foreign gene was found to be not
only integrated into the genome with a high frequency of
85.71% (multiple site versus single site insertions
analyzed by FISH), but also translated into a functional
protein and transferred to the next generation. Although
the procedure is somewhat more complicated than
TMGT, OMGT is still a useful technique with a much
higher success rate for creating transgenic mammals via
efficient and functional integration of the foreign gene
into the host genome and stable transmission of the
340 Zoological Research Vol. 29
Fig. 3 Schematic drawing of testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) method and retroviral gene delivery to mammals in vivo
A: Injection of solution containing tv-a gene driven by tissue-specific promoter and liposomes (in some cases) is performed at the corner of the
testis near the caput epididymis to a depth of 5-6
mm (Sato et al, 1999). B: The adult male mice carrying tv-a gene driven by a tissue-specific
promoter are mated with normal females,and the promoter-tv-a sequence will be delivered into zygotes by sperms. The offspring (F1
generations) are examined, and only those expressing TVA in specific tissues or organs are left for retroviral infection. Chicken DF-1 cells
transfected with RCAS vectors carrying genes of interest are propagated to obtain high titer viruses. Producer DF-1 cells, cell supernatants, or
concentrated viruses can be used to infect TVA-expressing mice. Tissue-specific infection can be achieved by direct injection of viruses or
virus-producing cells into an organ in which TVA is expressed
.
The anatomy atlas of testis is modified from the website
/Webanatomy/image_database/Reproductive/.
foreign gene to the offspring. Simplicity of procedure
and cost-effectiveness are the advantages of OMGT used
for tv-a transgenic animals in contrast to other traditional
methods, such as pronuclear microinjection.
2 RCAS vectors used for mammalian sys-
tem
2.1 Modified vectors for overcoming the limited in-
sertion size
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 341
As mentioned earlier, RCAS can only accommodate
an insert of less than 3 kb. This may not be a significant
problem because most cDNAs studied are less than 2.5
kb (Fisher et al, 1999). This limitation can, however, be
overcome by using RCAS and ASLV-A Env pseudotyped
HIV and MLV vectors, respectively (Murphy & Leavitt,
1999; Lewis et al, 2001), even if more than 3
kb
sequences must be inserted.
2.2 Improved vectors for infection of a broad range
of cell types
Although some reports have shown that RCAS can
infect non-dividing cells (Lu et al, 1999; Hatziioannou &
Goff, 2001), low efficiency suggests entrance of viral
DNA into nucleus depends on mitosis of host cells. To
overcome this limitation, Lewis et al (2001) succeeded in
using a pseudotyped replication-deficient HIV-1 based
lentiviral vector to infect non-dividing TVA positive cells.
However, there is no evidence that can clarify the
efficiency of this vector in vivo. Therefore, further
studies are required to improve the ability of RCAS
vectors into the genome of non-dividing host cells.
2.3 Vectors used in mammalian system
The RCAS family consists of a group of vectors for
variant demand. Actually, the current vectors used in
mammalian system, have an env gene from a murine
retrovirus instead of one from the ASLV. These vectors
are named as RCASBP, in which env gene is derived
from an amphotropic virus or ecotropic virus. The
properties of RCASBP vectors are summarized on the
website:
/hivdrp/RCAS/#table2.
3 Overview of current mammalian models
based on RCAS-TVA technique
The primary mammalian model based on
RCAS-TVA approach was developed in mice (Mus
musculus) by Federspiel et al (1994). This work opens a
new way to study development and oncogenesis, and
sheds light on models for tissue-specific gene therapy.
3.1 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study
developmental processes
RCAS-TVA based method has been proven to be
useful in developmental studies in mammalian system.
Murphy & Leavitt (1999) used the GP-Ibα regulatory
sequences to achieve megakaryocyte-lineage of mice
restricted expression of TVA. They infected the cells
with RCAS-PURO (expresses puromycin-resistance
gene) and RCAS-AP (expresses human placental alkaline
phosphatase) in vitro and in vivo, then generated and
characterized a pure population of primary CD41-positi-
ve megakaryocyte progenitors. The in vitro study
indicated that IL-3 inhibits the development of mature
megakaryocytes. Doetsch et al (1999) infected SVZ
(subventricular zone) astrocytes of tv-a transgenic mice
with RCAS-AP in vivo, and the AP-positive cells were
examined and traced. They demonstrated that SVZ
astrocytes act as neural stem cells in normal brain. Study
of lung development has been reported using the
RCAS-TVA model (Fisher et al, 1999). Lung buds of the
SPC-tv-a transgenic mice were infected with different
RCAS viruses to study the effects on branching
morphology in vitro. To study bone development in vivo,
Li et al (2005) established the BSP-tv-a transgenic mice
which selectively expressed TVA in skeletal tissues.
After infecting with RCASBP-Cbfa1/Runx2, bone and
tooth formation was delayed. They validated this model
as a unique system for studying molecular events
associated with bone formation in vivo.
Dunn et al (2000, 2001)have infected the neural
precursor cells and the melanoblasts expressing TVA
driven by nestin and Dopachrome tautomerase promoter
(DCT) with RCAS-Wnt, RCAS-lacZ (β-galactosidase)
and RCAS-Tyr (tyrosinase) respectively in primary
culture and in utero. They demonstrated that the
RCAS-TVA method was useful to study the development
of neural systems. Recently, the RCAS-TVA system was
successfully adapted by Yamashita and colleagues to
study neurogenesis in vivo (Yamashita et al, 2006). They
traced maturation of neurons by infecting the GFAP tv-a
(Gtv-a) transgenic mice with RCAS-EGFP
(CAG-CAT-enhanced green fluorescent protein), and
indicated that SVZ-derived neuroblasts differentiated
into mature neurons in the post-stroke striatum.
3.2 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study onco-
genesis
Currently, most models of tumors are traditionally
germ-line models constructed by transgenic or knockout
approaches. The major limitation of these models is that
the initiation and progression of carcinogenesis can not
be understood. However, the RCAS-TVA method
overcomes this limitation and allows investigation of the
carcinogenic potential of candidate oncogenes in somatic
342 Zoological Research Vol. 29
cells in vivo without creating individual transgenic lines
(Du & Li, 2007). To date, several oncogenes have been
studied in murine system using this technique. The
variant cancers or tumors and oncogenes studied are
summarized in Tab. 2.
Cancer is thought to be associated with multiple
genetic alterations. Microarray analysis of ovarian cancer
has demonstrated that oncogenesis of ovarian neoplasms
is controlled by many genes, and that changes in
expression of these genes correlate with malignancy
potential (Warrenfeltz et al, 2004). To study the effect of
multiple genes on carcinogenesis, the RCAS-TVA
system provides a flexible method to deliver several
genes simultaneously or sequentially. Holland et al (2000)
infected the Ntv-a transgenic mice with a combination of
DF-1 cells infected with and producing RCAS-Ras and
RCAS-Akt. They found that combination of activated
Ras and Akt induces high grade gliomas with the
histological features of human glioblastoma multiformes
(GBMs) although neither activated Ras nor Akt alone is
sufficient to induce GBM formation.
Orsulic et al (2002) isolated ovarian cells from TVA
transgenic mice deficient for p53, and infected the target
cells with RCAS-Myc, RCAS-Ras, and RCAS-Akt. Their
study showed that addition of any two of the oncogenes
Myc, Ras, and Akt were sufficient to induce ovarian
tumor formation when infected cells were injected into
the recipient mice at subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or
ovarian sites. They demonstrated that the ovarian surface
epithelium is the precursor tissue for these ovarian
carcinomas, and that introduction of oncogenes causes
phenotypic changes in the ovarian surface epithelial
cells.
A mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma was
generated by infecting tv-a transgenic wild-type and p53
null mice with RCAS-PyMT (Lewis et al, 2005). Tumors
were induced in both wild-type and p53 null mice, but
only in the mice lacking an intact p53 gene the resulting
tumors were poorly differentiated, invasive, and
metastatic to the lungs. This study demonstrates that
metastasis is dependent on both the oncogene and the
absence of p53.
3.3 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study gene
function
The lost-of-function and “knock out” techniques
are robust and practical for studying gene function in
mammalian system. The retroviral vectors have been
validated to express short hairpin RNA (shRNA) under
the control of an RNA polymerase III promoter for the
purpose of inhibiting gene expression in a sequence-
specific manner (Brummelkamp et al, 2002; Hemann et
al, 2003; Rubinson et al, 2003).
To date, RNA interference (RNAi) technique has
been incorporated successfully with the RCAS-TVA
method to study gene function in avian development.
Bron et al (2004) knocked the neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1)
receptor in chick embryos using the RCAS-RNAi
technique. They found that Sema3A-induced growth
cone was inhibited in dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
neurons. This result demonstrated the functional
knockdown of Nrp-1. Harpava and Cepko (2006)
delivered hairpins mediating RNA interference to the
Tab. 2 Cancers/tumors and oncogenes studied in murine system by RCAS-TVA approach
Cancer/tumor Oncogene Target
Breast cancer
Liver cancer
Nervous system tumors
Astrocytoma
Glioblastoma
Oligoastrocytoma
Oligodendroglioma
tumors (PNETs)
Ovarian cancer Myc, Ras, Akt Ovarian cells in culture
Ovarian cancer cell lines and tumors with
defined genetic alterations
Pancreatic cancer PyMT, Myc Pancreas in vivo Lewis et al, 2003
Orsulic et al, 2002
Xing & Orsulic, 2005
Cre
PyMT, Neu
PyMT, Myc
Ras, Akt
PDGF-B
Mammary gland in vivo
Liver parenchyma in vivo
Brain in vivo
Brain in vivo, Primary brain cell cultures
Neural progenitor cells, brain in vivo
Reference
Fisher et al, 1999
Du et al, 2006
Lewis et al, 2005
Holland & Varmus, 1998
Holland et al, 2000
Holland & Varmus, 1998; Dai et al, 2001
Dai et al, 2001
Fults et al, 2002 Primitive neuroectodermal
Myc
PDGF-B, platelet derived growth factor-b chain.
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 343
developing chick eye by RCAS viruses. They 'knocked
down' specific genes in infected areas of the retina. The
knock down persisted as the retina matured and could be
detected using in situ hybridization. Furthermore, the
amount of retinal tissue affected could be controlled by
manipulating the degree of infection.
In mammalian system, Bromberg-White et al (2004)
created a RCAS vector capable of expressing shRNA
that inhibits the expression of glyceraldehydes-3-phos-
phate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene, and reduces
GAPDH expression in cell line A375. They demonstrated
that RCAS vectors can be used to stably express shRNA
to inhibit gene expression in loss-of-function analyses of
specific genes in vitro as well as in vivo.
The RCASBP-Y vector has been modified to
incorporate “Gateway” site-specific recombination
cloning of genes into the viral construct, and will allow
for the efficient transfer and expression of cDNAs
required for functional genomic analyses in both avian
and mammalian model systems (Loftus et al, 2001).
3.4 Use of soluble TVA receptor, TVA-ligand bridge
proteins and RCAS system for gene therapy
RCAS system has been considered useful for gene
therapy of cancers (Orsulic, 2002; Xing & Orsulic, 2005).
However, gene therapy is dependant on the ability of
target cancer cells to accept the viral vectors carrying
therapeautic or suicide genes. Many TVA receptor
transgenic models have been generated in mammalian
system to accept RCAS vectors, simultaneously new
methods are developed. Several studies have indicated
that the membrane TVA receptor is not an absolute
requirement for virus infection, and RCAS vectors linked
with a soluble TVA can be delivered into
receptor-deficient cells (Snitkovsky & Young, 1998;
Damico & Bates, 2000; Contreras-Alcantara et al, 2006).
The viral receptor function of TVA is determined by a
40-residue, cysteine-rich motif called the LDL-A module,
which is highly homologous to the human low-density
lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) ligand-binding repeats
(LDL-A modules). It has been demonstrated that the
LDL-A module of TVA is necessary and sufficient to
mediate efficient EnvA binding and ASLV-A infection
(Rong & Bates, 1995). Therefore, the soluble TVA
receptor is an ideal candidate for transferring RCAS to
target cells deficient in membrane TVA.
Additionally, several proteins consisting of a TVA
receptor-ligand fusion structure have been developed to
serve as bifunctional bridge to surface receptors of target
cells and RCAS vectors (Fig. 4). The bridge proteins
contain the extracellular domain of TVA and a peptide
which can bind to surface receptors of target cells
(Orsulic, 2002). Several authors have succeeded in
infecting the mammalian cells expressing cognate
cellular receptors using the bridge proteins consisting of
the domain of epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), or heregulin (Boerger
et al, 1999; Snitkovsky et al, 2000, 2001; Snitkovsky &
Young, 1998, 2002). This method provides a flexible
way to target entry of RCAS vectors to mammalian cells.
Fig. 4 Delivery of RCAS vectors into target mammalian cells
by retroviral receptor-ligand fusion proteins
The fusion protein is comprised of the extracellular domain of TVA
fused with a ligand protein which permits it to bind to RCAS viral ENV
and to cell surface receptor respectively.
Hu et al (2007) investigated for the first time the
characteristics of RCAS as an alternative vector system
for transduction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor
cells. The new vectors were modified by replacing the
avian env gene with the gene encoding amphotropic or
ecotropic murine Env protein, which allows RCAS
vectors to infect mammalian cells efficiently (Barsov &
Hughes, 1996; Barsov et al, 2001). They used nonhuman
primate autologous transplantation models to test
whether the RCAS vectors can efficiently transduce
rhesus macaque CD34
+
hematopoietic stem and
progenitor cells. This study showed that RCAS vectors
could efficiently and stably transduce the CD34
+
hematopoietic progenitor cells with an efficiency of
transduction of up to 34% in vitro, and that highly
polyclonal hematopoietic reconstitution in myeloid and
lymphoid lineages was observed up to 18 months
post-transplantation in animals transplanted with RCAS
vector-transduced autologous CD34
+
cells. Hu et al
344 Zoological Research Vol. 29
(2007) indicated that the RCAS system should be
explored and further optimized for gene therapy
applications targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor
cells.
4 Conclusion and future research
This review shows that the RCAS-TVA based
technique is very useful and valid in various areas,
including basic biology, medicine and clinical research.
To date, a large number of RCAS vectors (and ancillary
tools, including soluble receptors, receptor-ligand fusion
proteins, mammalian cell lines expressing receptors, and
tv-a transgenic mice) have been developed for
mammalian system, and the number of mammalian
models (especially the mouse models) is constantly
increasing. These models can be used for a number of
different study purposes: gene function, development,
carcinogenesis and gene therapy.
Bioreactor is also a novel potential for the use of
RCAS-TVA system in the future. Pronuclear
microinjection is the major method today for the
production of transgenic animal bioreactor, but repeated
operation is inevitable to create different transgenic
animals producing different bioactive proteins. The
RCAS-TVA technique provides a convenient and flexible
way to produce a variety of biological products in one
transgenic animal, in which different target genes can be
introduced to the tissues or organs expressing TVA
References:
Barsov EV, Hughes SH. 1996. Gene transfer into mammalian cells by a
Rous sarcoma virus-based retroviral vector with the host range of
the amphotropic murine leukemia virus [J]. J Virol, 70: 3922-3929.
Barsov EV, Payne WS, Hughes SH. 2001. Adaptation of chimeric
retroviruses in vitro and in vivo: Isolation of avian retroviral
vectors with extended host range [J]. J Virol, 75: 4973-4983.
Barton GM, Medzhitov R. 2002. Retroviral delivery of small
interfering RNA into primary cells [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:
14943-14945.
Bates P, Young JA, Varmus HE. 1993. A receptor for subgroup a Rous
sarcoma virus is related to the low density lipoprotein receptor [J].
Cell, 74: 1043–1051.
Berberich SL, Macias M, Zhang L, Turek LP, Stoltzfus CM. 1990.
Comparison of Rous sarcoma virus RNA processing in chicken
and mouse fibroblasts: evidence for double-spliced RNA in
nonpermissive mouse cells [J]. J Virol, 64: 4313-4320.
Boerger AL, Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 1999. Retroviral vectors
preloaded with a viral receptor-ligand bridge protein are targeted to
specific cell types [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96: 9867-9872.
Boerkoel CF, Federspiel MJ, Salter DW, Payne W, Crittenden LB,
molecules simultaneously, sequentially or repeatedly. For
the objective of producing pharmaceuticals for treating
human diseases, mammary glands may be the ideal tissue
for use of the RCAS-TVA system.
The TMGT and OMGT techniques open a new
perspective in creating tv-a transgenic mammals.
Compared with the conventional pronuclear microinjec-
tion approach, use of TMGT and OMGT is much
cheaper and faster with quick and effective delivery of
genes to target tissues (Sato, 2005; Yang et al, 2007).
Therefore, the cost for the whole experiment is decreased.
The current studies demonstrate that gene knock down
can be made in vitro and in vivo by using the RCAS
system expressing RNAi. It can be predicted that the
RCAS-RNAi technique will be very useful for gene
function (or loss-of-function) studies. To improve the
infectious ability of RCAS vectors to cells absent of
mitosis, more and more vectors are being developed.
Furthermore, novel uses of the RCAS-TVA system
including infection of non-dividing somatic cells, and
neurons, are being developed in mammalian models.
On the whole, the RCAS-TVA based mammalian
model is a powerful tool for understanding the
mechanism and target treatment of human diseases. We
anticipate that new uses for the RCAS-TVA method in
mammals will be developed with a better understanding
of retroviruses, its hosts, and using other new biological
techniques.
Kung HJ, Hughes SH. 1993. A new defective retroviral vector
system based on the Bryan strain of Rous sarcoma virus [J].
Virology, 195: 669-679.
Bromberg-White JL, Webb CP, Patacsil VS, Miranti CK, Williams BO,
Holmen SL. 2004. Delivery of short hairpin RNA sequences by
using a replication-competent avian retroviral vector [J]. J Virol, 78:
4914-4916.
Bron R, Eickholt BJ, Vermeren M, Fragale N, Cohen J. 2004.
Functional knockdown of neuropilin-1 in the developing chick
nervous system by siRNA hairpins phenocopies genetic ablation in
the mouse [J]. Dev Dyn, 230: 299-308.
Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R. 2002. Stable suppression of
tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference [J]. Cancer
Cell, 2: 243-247.
Contreras-Alcantara S, Godby JA, Delos SE. 2006. The single ligand
binding repeat of TVA, a low density lipoprotein receptor related
protein, contains two ligand binding surfaces [J]. J Biol Chem, 281:
22827-22838.
Chhatwal JP, Hammack SE, Jasnow AM, Rainnie DG, Ressler KJ. 2007.
Identification of cell-type-specific promoters within the brain using
lentiviral vectors [J]. Gene Ther, 14: 575-583.
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 345
Dai C, Celestino JC, Okada Y, Louis DN, Fuller GN, Holland EC. 2001.
PDGF autocrine stimulation dedifferentiates cultured astrocytes
and induces oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas from
neural progenitors and astrocytes in vivo [J]. Genes Dev, 15:
1913-1925.
Damico R, Bates P. 2000. Soluble receptor-induced retroviral infection
of receptor-deficient cells [J]. J Virol, 74: 6469-6475.
Doetsch F, Caillé I, Lim DA, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A.
1999. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the
adult mammalian brain [J]. Cell, 97: 703-716.
Du Z, Li Y. 2007. RCAS-TVA in the mammary gland: an in vivo
oncogene screen and a high fidelity model for breast
transformation? [J]. Cell Cycle, 6: 823-826.
Du Z, Podsypanina K, Huang S, McGrath A, Toneff MJ, Bogoslovskaia
E, Zhang X, Moraes RC, Fluck M, Craig Allred DC, Lewis MT,
Varmus HE, Li Y. 2006. Introduction of oncogenes into mammary
glands in vivo with an avian retroviral vector initiates and promotes
carcinogenesis in mouse models [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103:
17396-17401.
Dunn KJ, Incao A, Watkins-Chow D, Li Y, Pavan WJ. 2001. In utero
complementation of a neural crest-derived melanocyte defect using
cell directed gene transfer [J]. Genesis, 30: 70-76.
Dunn KJ, Williams BO, Li Y, Pavan WJ. 2000. Neural crest-directed
gene transfer demonstrates Wnt1 role in melanocyte expansion and
differentiation during mouse development [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA, 97: 10050-10055.
Federspiel MJ, Bates P, Young JAT, Varmus HE, Hughes SH. 1994. A
system for tissue-specific gene targeting: Transgenic mice
susceptible to subgroup A avian leukosis virus-based retroviral
vectors [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91: 11241-11245.
Federspiel MJ, Swing DA, Eagleson B, Reid SW, Hughes SH. 1996.
Expression of transduced genes in mice generated by infecting
blastocysts with avian leukosis virus-based retroviral vectors [J].
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93: 4931-4936.
Fisher GH, Orsulic S, Holland E, Hively WP, Li Y, Lewis BC, Williams
BO, Varmus HE. 1999. Development of a flexible and specific
gene delivery system for production of murine tumor models [J].
Oncogene, 18: 5253-5260.
Fu SL, Huang YJ, Liang FP, Huang YF, Chuang CF, Wang SW, Yao JW.
2005. Malignant transformation of an epithelial cell by v-Src via
tv-a-mediated retroviral infection: A new cell model for studying
carcinogenesis [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 338: 830-838.
Fults D, Pedone C, Dai C, Holland EC. 2002. MYC expression
promotes the proliferation of neural progenitor cells in culture and
in vivo [J]. Neoplasia,
4: 32-39.
Furuhata S, Ide H, Miura Y, Yoshida T, Aoki K. 2003. Development of
a prostate-specific promoter for gene therapy against
androgen-independent prostate cancer [J]. Mol Ther, 7: 366-374.
Godwin AK, Miller PD, Getts LA, Jakson K, Sonoda G, Schray KJ,
Testa JR, Hamilton TC. 1995. Retroviral-like sequences
specifically expressed in the rat ovary detect genetic differences
between normal and transformed rat ovarian epithelial cells [J].
Endocrinology, 136: 4640-4649.
Goldsmith ME, Short KJ, Elwood PC, Kowan KH. 1999. A
recombinant adenoviral vector with selective transgene expression
in ovarian cancer cells [J]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 40: 479.
Greger JG, Katz RA, Taganov K, Rall GF, Skalka AM. 2004.
Transduction of terminally differentiated neurons by avian sarcoma
virus [J]. J Virol, 78: 4902-4906.
Hamra FK, Gatlin J, Chapman KM, Grellhesl DM, Garcia JV, Hammer
RE, Garbers DL. 2002. Production of transgenic rats by lentiviral
transduction of male germ-line stem cells [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA, 99: 14931-14936.
Harpavat S, Cepko CL. 2006. RCAS-RNAi: a loss-of-function method
for the developing chick retina [J]. BMC Dev Biol, 6: 2
(/1471-213X/6/2).
Hatziioannou T, Goff SP. 2001. Infection of nondividing cells by Rous
sarcoma virus [J]. J Virol, 75: 9526-9531.
He X, Qi B, Liu GS, Yu WD, Chen QX. 2006. A novel method to
transfer gene in vivo system [J]. Prog Biochem Biophys, 33:
685-690.
Hemann MT, Fridman JS, Zilfou JT, Hernando E, Paddison PJ,
Cordon-Cardo C, Hannon GJ, Lowe SW. 2003. An epi-allelic
series of p53 hypomorphs created by stable RNAi produces
distinct tumor phenotypes in vivo [J]. Nat Genet, 33: 396-400.
Himly M, Foster DN, Bottoli I, Iacovoni JS, Vogt PK. 1998. The DF-1
chicken fibroblast cell line: transformation induced by diverse
oncogenes and cell death resulting from infection by avian leukosis
viruses [J]. Virology, 248: 295-304.
Holland EC, Celestino J, Dai C, Schaefer L, Sawaya RE, Fuller GN.
2000. Combined activation of Ras and Akt in neural progenitors
induces glioblastoma formation in mice [J]. Nat Genet, 25: 55-57.
Holland EC, Hively WP, DePinho RA, Varmus HE. 1998. A
constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates
with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce
glioma-like lesions in mice [J]. Genes Dev, 12: 3675-3685.
Holland EC, Varmus HE. 1998. Basic fibroblast growth factor induces
cell migration and proliferation after glia-specific gene transfer in
mice [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95: 1218-1223.
Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Dobrinski I. 2002. Germ cell
transplantation in pigs [J]. Biol Reprod, 66: 21-28.
Honaramooz A, Behboodi E, Blash S, Megee SO, Dobrinski I. 2003.
Germ cell transplantation in goats [J]. Mol Reprod Dev, 64:
422-428.
Hu J, Ferris A, Larochelle A, Krouse A, Metzger ME, Donahue RE,
Hughes SH, Dunbar CE. 2007. Transduction of rhesus macaque
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with avian sarcoma and
leukosis viral vectors [J]. Hum Gene Ther, 18: 691-700.
Hu WS, Pathak VK. 2000. Design of retroviral vectors and helper cells
for gene therapy [J]. Pharm Rev, 52: 493-512.
Hughes SH, Greenhouse JJ, Petropoulos CJ, Sutrave P. 1987. Adaptor
plasmids simplify the insertion of foreign DNA into
helper-independent retroviral vectors [J]. J Virol, 61: 3004-3012.
Hughes ST, Kosik E. 1984. Mutagenesis of the region between env and
src of the SR-A strain of Rous sarcoma virus for the purpose of
constructing helper-independent vectors [J]. Virology, 136: 89-99.
Katz RA, Greger JG, Darby K, Boimel P, Rall GF, Skalka AM. 2002.
Transduction of interphase cells by avian sarcoma virus [J]. J Virol,
76: 5422-5434.
Kawakami Y, Rodríguez-León J, Koth CM, Büscher D, Itoh T, Raya Á,
Ng JK, Esteban CR, Takahashi S, Henrique D, Schwarz MF,
Asahara H, Belmonte JCI. 2003. MKP3 mediates the cellular
response to FGF8 signalling in the vertebrate limb [J]. Nat Cell
Biol, 5: 513-519.
Korfhagen TR, Glasser SW, Wert SE, Bruno MD, Daugherty CC,
McNeish JD, Stock JL, Potter SS, Whitsett JA. 1990. Cis-acting
sequences from a human surfactant protein gene confer
pulmonary- specific gene expression in transgenic mice [J]. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 87: 6122-6126.
Kruse F, Rose SD, Swift GH, Hammer RE, MacDonald RJ. 1993. An
endocrine-specific element is an integral component of an
exocrine-specific pancreatic enhancer [J]. Genes Dev, 7: 774-786.
Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG, Spadafora
C. 1989. Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into
eggs: genetic transformation of mice [J]. Cell, 57: 717-723.
Lewis BC, Chinnasamy N, Morgan RA, Varmus HE. 2001.
Development of an avian leukosis sarcoma virus subgroup A
pseudotyped lentiviral vector [J]. J Virol, 75: 9339-9344.
Lewis BC, Klimstra DS, Socci ND, Xu S, Koutcher JA, Varmus HE.
2005. The absence of p53 promotes metastasis in a novel somatic
mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Mol Cell Biol
, 25:
1228-1237.
Lewis BC, Klimstra DS, Varmus HE. 2003. The c-myc and PyMT
oncogenes induce different tumor types in a somatic mouse model
346 Zoological Research Vol. 29
for pancreatic cancer [J]. Genes Dev, 17: 3127-3138.
Li L, Zhu J, Tu Q, Yamauchi M, Sodek J, Karsenty G, Tang J, Chen J.
2005. An in vivo model to study osteogenic gene regulation:
targeting an avian retroviral receptor (TVA) to bone with bone
sialoprotein (BSP) promoter [J]. J Bone Min Res, 20: 1403-1413.
Loftus SK, Larson DM, Watkins-Chow D, Church DM, Pavan WJ.
2001. Generation of RCAS vectors useful for functional genomic
analyses [J]. DNA Res, 8: 221-226.
Logan M, Tabin C. 1998. Targeted gene misexpression in chick limb
buds using avian replication-competent retroviruses [J]. Methods,
14: 407-420.
Lu Q, Gore M, Zhang Q, Camenisch T, Boast S, Casagranda F, Lai C,
Skinner MK, Klein R, Matsushima GK, Earp HS, Goff SP, Lemke
G. 1999. Tyro-3 family receptors are essential regulators of
mammalian spermatogenesis [J]. Nature, 398: 723-728.
Montaner S, Sodhi A, Molinolo A, Bugge TH, Sawai ET, He Y, Li Y,
Ray PE, Gutkind JS. 2003. Endothelial infection with KSHV genes
in vivo reveals that vGPCR initiates Kaposi's sarcomagenesis and
can promote the tumorigenic potential of viral latent genes [J].
Cancer Cell, 3: 23-36.
Murphy GJ, Leavitt AD. 1999. A model for studying megakaryocyte
development and biology [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96:
3065-3070.
Orsulic S. 2002. An RCAS-TVA-based approach to designer mouse
models [J]. Mam Gen, 13: 543-547.
Orsulic S, Li Y, Soslow RA, Vitale-Cross LA, Gutkind JS, Varmus HE.
2002. Induction of ovarian cancer by defined multiple genetic
changes in a mouse model system [J]. Cancer Cell, 1: 53-62.
Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. 2002. Retrovirus-mediated
modification of male germline stem cells in rats [J]. Biol Reprod,
67: 874-879.
Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. 1986. Germ-line transformation of mice [J].
Annu Rev Genet, 20: 465-499.
Pao W, Klimstra DS, Fisher GH, Varmus HE. 2003. Use of avian
retroviral vectors to introduce transcriptional regulators into
mammalian cells for analyses of tumor maintenance [J]. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA, 100: 8764-8769.
Pekarik V, Bourikas D, Miglino N, Joset P, Preiswerk S, Stoeckli ET.
2003. Screening for gene function in chicken embryo using RNAi
and electroporation [J]. Nat Biotechnol, 21: 93-96.
Petropoulos CJ, Hughes SH. 1991. Replication-competent retroviral
vectors for the transfer and expression of gene cassettes in avian
cells [J].
J Virol, 65: 3728-3737.
Petropoulos CJ, Payne W, Salter DW, Hughes SH. 1992. Using avian
retroviral vectors for gene transfer [J]. J Virol, 66: 3391-3397.
Phillips PM, Wynn PC, Sheehy PA. 2006. Successful adaptation of the
RCAS-TVA gene transfer system for use in a bovine mammary
epithelial cell culture model [J]. Mol Ther, 13: S318.
Pinto VB, Prasad S, Yewdell J, Bennink J, Hughes SH. 2000.
Restricting expression prolongs expression of foreign genes
introduced into animals by retroviruses [J]. J Virol, 74:
10202-10206.
Rong L, Bates P. 1995. Analysis of the subgroup A avian sarcoma and
leukosis virus receptor: the 40-residue, cysteine-rich, low-density
lipoprotein receptor repeat motif of Tva is sufficient to mediate
viral entry [J]. J Virol, 69: 4847-4853.
Rubinson DA, Dillon CP, Kwiatkowski A
V, Sievers C, Yang L, Kopinja
J, Rooney DL, Zhang M, Ihriq MM, McManus MT, Gertler FB,
Scott ML & van Parijs L. 2003. A lentivirus-based system to
functionally silence genes in primary mammalian cells, stem cells
and transgenic mice by RNA interference [J]. Nat Genet, 33:
401-406.
Sato M. 2005. Transgenesis via sperm [J]. J Mamm Ova Res, 22:
92-100.
Sato M, Gotoh K, Kimura M. 1999. Sperm-mediated gene transfer by
direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis [J]. Transgenics,
2: 357-369.
Sato M, Nakamura S. 2004. A novel gene transmission pattern of
exogenous DNA in offspring obtained after testis-mediated gene
transfer (TMGT) [J]. Transgenics, 4: 121-135.
Schaefer-Klein J, Givol I, Barsov EV, Whitcomb JM, VanBrocklin M,
Foster DN, Federspiel MJ, Hughes SH. 1998. The EV-O-derived
cell line DF-1 supports the efficient replication of avian
leukosis-sarcoma viruses and vectors [J]. Virology, 248: 305-311.
Snitkovsky S, Niederman TM, Carter BS, Mulligan RC, Young JAT.
2000. A TVA-single-chain antibody fusion protein mediates
specific targeting of a subgroup A avian leukosis virus vector to
cells expressing a tumor-specific form of epidermal growth factor
receptor [J]. J Virol, 74: 9540-9545.
Snitkovsky S, Niederman TM, Mulligan RC, Young JAT. 2001.
Targeting avian leukosis virus subgroup A vectors by using a
TVA-VEGF bridge protein [J]. J Virol, 75: 1571-1575.
Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 1998. Cell-specific viral targeting mediated
by a soluble retroviral receptor-ligand fusion protein [J]. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA, 95: 7063-7068.
Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 2002. Targeting retroviral vector infection to
cells that express heregulin receptors using a TVA-heregulin bridge
protein [J]. Virology, 292: 150-155.
Soneoka Y, Cannon PM, Ramsdale EE, Griffiths JC, Romano G,
Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ. 1995. A transient three-plasmid
expression system for the production of high titer retroviral vectors
[J]. Nucl Acids Res, 23: 628-633.
Warrenfeltz S, Pavlik S, Datta S, Kraemer ET, Benigno B, McDonald
JF. 2004. Gene expression profiling of epithelial ovarian tumors
correlated with malignant potential [J]. Mol Cancer, 3: 27-45.
Wills JW, Craven RC, Achacoso JA. 1989. Creation and expression of
myristylated forms of Rous sarcoma virus gag protein in
mammalian cells [J]. J Virol, 63: 4331-4343.
Xing D, Orsulic S. 2005. A genetically defined mouse ovarian
carcinoma model for the molecular characterization of
pathway-targeted therapy and tumor resistance [J]. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA, 102: 6936-6941.
Yamashita T, Ninomiya M, Acosta PH, García-Verdugo JM, Sunabori T,
Sakaguchi M, Adachi K, Kojima T, Hirota Y, Kawase T, Araki N,
Abe K, Okano H, Sawamoto K. 2006. Subventricular zone-derived
neuroblasts migrate and differentiate into mature neurons in the
post-stroke adult striatum [J]. J Neurosci, 26: 6627-6636.
Yang SY, Wang JG, Cui HX, Sun SG, Li Q, Gu L, Hong Y, Liu PP, Liu
WQ. 2007. Efficient generation of transgenic mice by direct
intraovarian injection of plasmid DNA [J]. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun, 358: 266-271.
Young JA, Bates P, Varmus HE. 1993. Isolation of a chicken gene that
confers susceptibility to infection by subgroup A avian leukosis
and sarcoma viruses [J]. J Virol, 67: 1811-1816..
2024年5月22日发(作者:宁清卓)
动 物 学 研 究 2008,Jun. 29(3):335—345 CN 53-1040/Q ISSN 0254-5853
Zoological Research DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.03335
Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique
NIU Yi-dong
1,*
, LIANG Shu-long
2
(1. Laboratory Animal Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China;
2. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100083, China)
Abstract: The retroviral vector (RCAS) has been widely used in avian system to study development and diseases, but
is not suitable for mammals which do not produce the retrovirus receptor TVA. In this review, we trace the current uses of
RCAS-TVA approach in mammalian system with improved strategies, including generation of tv-a transgenic mice, use of
soluble TVA receptor and retroviral receptor-ligand fusion proteins, improvement of RCAS vectors, and compare a series
of mammalian models in variant studies of gene function, development, oncogenesis and gene therapy. All those studies
demonstrate that the RCAS-TVA based mammalian models are powerful tools for understanding the mechanisms and
target treating of human diseases.
Key words: RCAS vector; TVA; Specific promoter; Transgenic animal; Mammalian model
基于RCAS-TVA技术的哺乳动物模型
牛屹东
1,*
,梁蜀龙
2
(1.北京大学人民医院实验动物中心,北京 100044;2.北京大学基础医学院,北京 100083)
摘要:近年来,鸟类逆转录病毒载体(RCAS)及其受体(TVA)系统在哺乳动物转基因模型中得到广泛应用。
本文对转tv-a基因小鼠的制备、特异性启动子选择、RCAS载体的改进等方面进行综述,展示近来RCAS-TVA系
统在哺乳动物所取得的成果,并对RCAS-TVA基因转移技术的应用前景作一展望。
关键词:RCAS载体;TVA;特异性启动子;转基因动物;哺乳动物模型
中图分类号:Q812; Q78 文章标识码:A 文章编号:0254-5853-(2008)03-0335-011
Retroviruses are enveloped viruses possessing a
RNA genome, and replicate via a DNA intermediate.
They rely on the enzyme, reverse transcriptase, to
perform the reverse transcription of their genomes from
RNA into DNA, which can then be integrated into the
host's genome. The viruses then replicate as part of the
cell's DNA (/wiki/Retrovirus). So
they have the ability to introduce new genetic
information into the chromosomes of target cells, and
serve as vehicles for transfer of exogenes (Orsulic, 2002).
To date, retroviral vectors have been wildly developed to
study gene function and therapy, developmental
Received date:2008-01-17; Accepted date:2008-03-28
processes, oncogenesis, and so forth (Logan & Tabin,
1998; Hu & Pathak, 2000; Barton & Medzhitov, 2002;
Kawakami et al, 2003; Pao et al, 2003; Harpavat &
Cepko, 2006; Du & Li, 2007). Among those retroviruses,
the avian sarcoma-leukosis virus-A (ASLV-A)-derived
vector called RCAS (Replication Competent ASLV long
terminal repeat with Splice acceptor) is used most
extensively in avian system, because high titer viral
stocks can be harvested in avian cells without helper
components. RCAS vectors are derived from the SR-A
strain of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) by deleting the src
oncogene with a multi-cloning site where exogenes can
Foundation item: Supported by Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Foundation (RDB2007-03)
收稿日期:2008-01-17; 接受日期:2008-03-28
基金项目:北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDB2007-03)
*
通讯作者(Corresponding author),Tel: 86-10-88325990, E-mail: niuyd07@
336 Zoological Research Vol. 29
be inserted (Hughes & Kosik, 1984; Hughes et al, 1987;
Petropoulos & Hughes, 1991; Boerkoel et al, 1993). The
multi-cloning site can stably accommodate inserts up to
2.5
kb (Fig. 1). Expression of the inserted genes can be
driven by either the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) or
an appropriate internal promoter (Petropoulos et al, 1992;
Du et al, 2006). A loss-of-function method, RCAS-RNAi
(RNA interference) technique, has been verified to be
efficient in “knocking down” the specific genes in
avian developing craniofacial tissues, the limb bud,
dorsal root ganglion, and the retina (Kawakami et al,
2003; Pekarik et al, 2003; Harpavat & Cepko, 2006).
Fig. 1 Constructs of the RSV and RCAS vector
The diagrams show the organization of viral DNA genomes and the
location of genes (gag, pol, env, and src) and long terminal repeat
(LTR). The src oncogene of RSV carries a splice acceptor (SA), which
is retained in RCAS. The src oncogene has been deleted and replaced
by a multi-cloning site in RCAS vector.
However, RCAS vectors can not be used in
mammalian system directly without any improvement on
the mammalian cells, which do not express the surface
receptors for virus entry and infection. TVA, a member
of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor family, is
encoded by the tv-a gene and acts as the receptor for
ASLV-A in avian cells (Bates et al, 1993; Young et al,
1993). mRNA transcribed from the tv-a gene is
alternatively spliced to produce at least two proteins, a
transmembrane and a GPI-anchored isoform (Bates et al,
1993). The mammalian cells are able to be infected and
allow for genome integration by ASLV-A or RCAS virus
if the cells are engineered to express TVA ectopically on
the surface, and both of the isoforms are sufficient to
permit infection of mammalian cells (Bates et al, 1993;
Young et al, 1993).
Compared with the general mammalian counterparts,
RCAS vectors can be constructed to encode all of the
proteins required for assembly of infectious particles in
addition to the transferred gene of interest, so they do not
require helper cells (Hughes et al, 1987; Petropoulos &
Hughes, 1991; Boerkoel et al, 1993). High-titer viral
stocks can be produced in avian cells (Himly et al, 1998;
Schaefer-Klein et al, 1998). Viral proteins are
inefficiently produced in mammalian cells, so the vectors
can not spread from the target animals and cell-to-cell
spreading within any individual is also prevented (Wills
et al, 1989; Berberich et al, 1990). The lack of viral
proteins also decreases the immune response by the host
(Pinto et al, 2000). Furthermore, the most specific
advantage of RCAS vectors is that multiple genes can be
transferred sequentially into the target cells of a single
transgenic animal (Federspiel et al, 1994; Holland et al,
1998; Murphy & Leavitt, 1999). This feature should be
attributed to the sufficient supplement of TVA receptor
which is not blocked by the poorly expressed viral
envelope protein in mammalian cells. Recent
experiments indicate that the RCAS vectors have the
ability to infect non-dividing mammalian cells, including
the primary neurons, although there is no direct evidence
(Hatziioannou & Goff, 2001; Katz et al, 2002; Greger et
al, 2004). The procedure to generate a RCAS-TVA based
model is shown in Fig. 2.
Some potential limitations for using the RCAS-TVA
system, however, should be given close attention. Target
cells, tissues and organs must express the receptor TVA.
Therefore, it is crucial to generate TVA transgenic
animals before RCAS infection. RCAS can only
accommodate an insert of less than 3
kb, but this
limitation can be partially overcome by using
pseudotyped vectors. The MLV (moloney murine
leukemia virus), carrying capacity of insert up to 6-7
kb,
has been efficiently pseudotyped with ASLV envelope
protein (Soneoka et al, 1995; Murphy & Leavitt, 1999).
But, integration site of viral DNA can not be controlled.
Efficiency of infection is dependent on the accessibility
of the organ and the proliferation rate of target cells.
Description of various advantages and limitations of
using the RCAS-TVA system has been reviewed in detail
by Orsulic (2002).
1 Transgenic mammals expressing TVA
molecules
1.1 Choice of specific promoters
The key element to produce tv-a transgenic animals
is the tissue-specific and the lineage-specific promoters
which decide specific expression of TVA in target cells,
tissues and organs. Therefore, a nucleotide fragment
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 337
consisting of the tv-a cDNA and a proper promoter must
be constructed before RCAS infection. The specific
promoters currently used to drive expression of tv-a gene
in mammalian system are summarized in Tab. 1.
338 Zoological Research Vol. 29
Fig. 2 Schematic drawing of the RCAS-TVA technique in mammalian system
A: The target mammalian somatic cells are engineered to express TVA receptor under a tissue-specific promoter and therefore are
susceptible to virus infection. B: Avian cells are transfected with a plasmid encoding the replication-competent, avian viral vector RCAS
which contains the viral genes, gag, pol and env and a gene of interest (X gene). The viruses are produced in high titer and can infect
avian cells again through the TVA receptors on the surface of cells. C: The mammalian cells expressing TVA are infected by RCAS
vectors, and only the protein encoded by X gene is efficiently produced. Because very little viral proteins are produced, no infectious
RCAS are replicated in mammalian cells. Therefore, the TVA receptors can be used repeatedly with different vectors. The neighbor cells
can not be infected by RCAS because of their deficiency of TVA receptor. D: The target cells transfected with the genes of interest will
show different destinies, such as proliferating or dying.
Tab. 1 Summary of the target cells, tissues and organs expressing TVA and
promoters used to drive expression of tv-a in mammalian system
Target Promoter/contex
Bone
Brain
Hematopoietic cell
Liver
Lung
Mammary epithelial cell culture
Mammary gland
MEFs
Most or all tissues
Neural crest cell
Ovary
Pancreas
RK3E cell line
Skeletal muscle and heart
Vascular endothelium
BSP
GFAP
nestin
GP-Ibα
albumin
SPC
MACT
MMTV
β-actin
β-actin
TRP2
β-actin , keratin
elastase I
CMV
α-actin
Tie2
Reference
Li et al, 2005
Holland & Varmus, 1998; Yamashita et al, 2006
Holland et al, 1998
Murphy & Leavitt, 1999
Lewis et al, 2005
Fisher et al, 1999
Phillips et al, 2006
Du et al, 2006
Pao et al, 2003
Federspiel et al, 1996
Fisher et al., 1999
Orsulic et al, 2002; Xing & Orsulic, 2005
Kruse et al, 1993; Lewis et al, 2003
Fu et al, 2005
Federspiel et al, 1994
Montaner et al, 2003
BSP, bone sialoprotein; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GP, glycoprotein;
MACT, mouse β-actin; MEFs, murine embryonic fibroblasts; MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; RK3E,
rat kidney epithelial cell line; SPC, surfactant protein-C; TRP2, tyrosinase-related protein-2.
Additionally, numerous studies have indicated that
some other promoters, including the ovary specific
promoter (OSP1) and the high-affinity folate receptors
promoter (HAFR) (Godwin et al, 1995; Goldsmith et al,
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 339
1999), the modified rat probasin (rPB) promoters
(Furuhata et al, 2003), and the neuroactive peptide
cholecystokinin (CCK) promoter (Chhatwal et al, 2007),
are of potential value for tissue specific expression of the
tv-a gene.
1.2 Both isoforms of TVA molecule are sufficient for
acceptance of the RCAS vectors
As mentioned earlier, two isoforms, a
1999; Fisher et al, 1999).
However, the microinjection method has some
potential limitations: 1. limited success in producing
transgenic animals of larger species; 2. requirement of
special equipment for DNA microinjection and high
technical skills; 3. labor intensive. The new mean has
been developed by using sperm cells, including
spermatogonia, as the vehicle to deliver exogenous DNA
transmembrane and a GPI-linked one, have been
identified. In the current tv-a transgenic mice, the
GPI-anchored isoform is commonly used (Federspiel et
al, 1996; Holland et al, 1998; Du et al, 2006), but the
transmembrane isoform has also be used successfully in
the study of Murphy & Leavitt (1999). Therefore, both
isoforms can accept the RCAS vectors although the
physiological functions have not been determined.
1.3 Gene transfer methods
The most widely used method to generate transgenic
animals is to microinject foreign DNA into the
pronucleus of a fertilized egg. Pronuclear microinjection
is conceptually straightforward, although it demands
special equipment and technical skill, and has the
additional feature that any cloned DNA can be used
(Palmiter & Brinster, 1986). The primary mammalian
model based on the RCAS-TVA approach was developed
in transgenic mice expressing TVA specifically in muscle
cells. They were generated by microinjecting a
nucleotide fragment consisting of the tv-a cDNA and
chicken α-actin promoter fragment into fertilized mice
eggs (Federspiel et al, 1994). Subsequently, Holland et al.
generated mice expressing TVA on the surface of glial
cells by microinjection of Gtv-a transgene, which is a 2.2
kb fragment of the GFAP promoter driving expression of
the quail tv-a cDNA and a fragment from the mouse
protamine gene (MP-1) supplying an intron and signal
for polyadenylation (Holland et al, 1998, 2000). Using
the microinjection method, then, tv-a transgenic mice
were extensively created to accept RCAS vectors in
cancer models of mammary, ovary, pancreas, liver, lung,
brain, vascular endothelium, melanoma, and other cell
types (Korfhagen et al, 1990; Holland & Varmus, 1998;
Holland et al, 1998; Fisher et al, 1999; Orsulic et al,2002;
Montaner et al, 2003; Lewis et al, 2003, 2005; Pao et al,
2003; Fu et al, 2005; Du et al, 2006) and development
models, including neuron, hemapoietic cell lines, and
other organs (Doetsch et al, 1999; Murphy & Leavitt,
into oocytes, and is therefore called “sperm-mediated
gene transfer” (SMGT, Lavitrano et al, 1989). Based on
SMGT, transgenic rats (Hamra et al, 2002; Orwig et al,
2002), pigs (Honaramooz et al, 2002) and goats
(Honaramooz et al, 2003) have now been produced. As
the improved method of SMGT, testis-mediated gene
transfer (TMGT) has been demonstrated to be practical
in delivering foreign DNA directly into the interstitial
space of adult mammalian testes (Fig. 3A), and then the
exogenous DNA is transmitted to oocytes via fertilization
(Sato et al, 1999; Sato & Nakamura, 2004). Recently, He
et al (2006) further indicated that transgenic efficiency of
TMGT was very high in both F1 and F2 mice offspring
(41% and 37% respectively), and that TMGT was
suitable for creating transgenic animals. The TMGT
technique is very simple and convenient. A needle, a
plastic disposal syringe, and a dissecting microscope are
sufficient for delivery of DNA. The TMGT technique
opens a new perspective for generating tv-a transgenic
mammals (Fig. 3B), although it requires further
improvement.
More recently, Yang et al (2007) established a rapid
procedure for obtaining transgenic mice by directly
injecting exogenes into the ovaries of fertile mice, called
ovary mediated gene transfer (OMGT). After natural
fertilization, healthy transgenic mice were obtained, and
the introduced foreign gene was inherited by F1
offspring (64.9%) and transmitted to F2 progeny
(66.94%) stably. The foreign gene was found to be not
only integrated into the genome with a high frequency of
85.71% (multiple site versus single site insertions
analyzed by FISH), but also translated into a functional
protein and transferred to the next generation. Although
the procedure is somewhat more complicated than
TMGT, OMGT is still a useful technique with a much
higher success rate for creating transgenic mammals via
efficient and functional integration of the foreign gene
into the host genome and stable transmission of the
340 Zoological Research Vol. 29
Fig. 3 Schematic drawing of testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) method and retroviral gene delivery to mammals in vivo
A: Injection of solution containing tv-a gene driven by tissue-specific promoter and liposomes (in some cases) is performed at the corner of the
testis near the caput epididymis to a depth of 5-6
mm (Sato et al, 1999). B: The adult male mice carrying tv-a gene driven by a tissue-specific
promoter are mated with normal females,and the promoter-tv-a sequence will be delivered into zygotes by sperms. The offspring (F1
generations) are examined, and only those expressing TVA in specific tissues or organs are left for retroviral infection. Chicken DF-1 cells
transfected with RCAS vectors carrying genes of interest are propagated to obtain high titer viruses. Producer DF-1 cells, cell supernatants, or
concentrated viruses can be used to infect TVA-expressing mice. Tissue-specific infection can be achieved by direct injection of viruses or
virus-producing cells into an organ in which TVA is expressed
.
The anatomy atlas of testis is modified from the website
/Webanatomy/image_database/Reproductive/.
foreign gene to the offspring. Simplicity of procedure
and cost-effectiveness are the advantages of OMGT used
for tv-a transgenic animals in contrast to other traditional
methods, such as pronuclear microinjection.
2 RCAS vectors used for mammalian sys-
tem
2.1 Modified vectors for overcoming the limited in-
sertion size
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 341
As mentioned earlier, RCAS can only accommodate
an insert of less than 3 kb. This may not be a significant
problem because most cDNAs studied are less than 2.5
kb (Fisher et al, 1999). This limitation can, however, be
overcome by using RCAS and ASLV-A Env pseudotyped
HIV and MLV vectors, respectively (Murphy & Leavitt,
1999; Lewis et al, 2001), even if more than 3
kb
sequences must be inserted.
2.2 Improved vectors for infection of a broad range
of cell types
Although some reports have shown that RCAS can
infect non-dividing cells (Lu et al, 1999; Hatziioannou &
Goff, 2001), low efficiency suggests entrance of viral
DNA into nucleus depends on mitosis of host cells. To
overcome this limitation, Lewis et al (2001) succeeded in
using a pseudotyped replication-deficient HIV-1 based
lentiviral vector to infect non-dividing TVA positive cells.
However, there is no evidence that can clarify the
efficiency of this vector in vivo. Therefore, further
studies are required to improve the ability of RCAS
vectors into the genome of non-dividing host cells.
2.3 Vectors used in mammalian system
The RCAS family consists of a group of vectors for
variant demand. Actually, the current vectors used in
mammalian system, have an env gene from a murine
retrovirus instead of one from the ASLV. These vectors
are named as RCASBP, in which env gene is derived
from an amphotropic virus or ecotropic virus. The
properties of RCASBP vectors are summarized on the
website:
/hivdrp/RCAS/#table2.
3 Overview of current mammalian models
based on RCAS-TVA technique
The primary mammalian model based on
RCAS-TVA approach was developed in mice (Mus
musculus) by Federspiel et al (1994). This work opens a
new way to study development and oncogenesis, and
sheds light on models for tissue-specific gene therapy.
3.1 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study
developmental processes
RCAS-TVA based method has been proven to be
useful in developmental studies in mammalian system.
Murphy & Leavitt (1999) used the GP-Ibα regulatory
sequences to achieve megakaryocyte-lineage of mice
restricted expression of TVA. They infected the cells
with RCAS-PURO (expresses puromycin-resistance
gene) and RCAS-AP (expresses human placental alkaline
phosphatase) in vitro and in vivo, then generated and
characterized a pure population of primary CD41-positi-
ve megakaryocyte progenitors. The in vitro study
indicated that IL-3 inhibits the development of mature
megakaryocytes. Doetsch et al (1999) infected SVZ
(subventricular zone) astrocytes of tv-a transgenic mice
with RCAS-AP in vivo, and the AP-positive cells were
examined and traced. They demonstrated that SVZ
astrocytes act as neural stem cells in normal brain. Study
of lung development has been reported using the
RCAS-TVA model (Fisher et al, 1999). Lung buds of the
SPC-tv-a transgenic mice were infected with different
RCAS viruses to study the effects on branching
morphology in vitro. To study bone development in vivo,
Li et al (2005) established the BSP-tv-a transgenic mice
which selectively expressed TVA in skeletal tissues.
After infecting with RCASBP-Cbfa1/Runx2, bone and
tooth formation was delayed. They validated this model
as a unique system for studying molecular events
associated with bone formation in vivo.
Dunn et al (2000, 2001)have infected the neural
precursor cells and the melanoblasts expressing TVA
driven by nestin and Dopachrome tautomerase promoter
(DCT) with RCAS-Wnt, RCAS-lacZ (β-galactosidase)
and RCAS-Tyr (tyrosinase) respectively in primary
culture and in utero. They demonstrated that the
RCAS-TVA method was useful to study the development
of neural systems. Recently, the RCAS-TVA system was
successfully adapted by Yamashita and colleagues to
study neurogenesis in vivo (Yamashita et al, 2006). They
traced maturation of neurons by infecting the GFAP tv-a
(Gtv-a) transgenic mice with RCAS-EGFP
(CAG-CAT-enhanced green fluorescent protein), and
indicated that SVZ-derived neuroblasts differentiated
into mature neurons in the post-stroke striatum.
3.2 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study onco-
genesis
Currently, most models of tumors are traditionally
germ-line models constructed by transgenic or knockout
approaches. The major limitation of these models is that
the initiation and progression of carcinogenesis can not
be understood. However, the RCAS-TVA method
overcomes this limitation and allows investigation of the
carcinogenic potential of candidate oncogenes in somatic
342 Zoological Research Vol. 29
cells in vivo without creating individual transgenic lines
(Du & Li, 2007). To date, several oncogenes have been
studied in murine system using this technique. The
variant cancers or tumors and oncogenes studied are
summarized in Tab. 2.
Cancer is thought to be associated with multiple
genetic alterations. Microarray analysis of ovarian cancer
has demonstrated that oncogenesis of ovarian neoplasms
is controlled by many genes, and that changes in
expression of these genes correlate with malignancy
potential (Warrenfeltz et al, 2004). To study the effect of
multiple genes on carcinogenesis, the RCAS-TVA
system provides a flexible method to deliver several
genes simultaneously or sequentially. Holland et al (2000)
infected the Ntv-a transgenic mice with a combination of
DF-1 cells infected with and producing RCAS-Ras and
RCAS-Akt. They found that combination of activated
Ras and Akt induces high grade gliomas with the
histological features of human glioblastoma multiformes
(GBMs) although neither activated Ras nor Akt alone is
sufficient to induce GBM formation.
Orsulic et al (2002) isolated ovarian cells from TVA
transgenic mice deficient for p53, and infected the target
cells with RCAS-Myc, RCAS-Ras, and RCAS-Akt. Their
study showed that addition of any two of the oncogenes
Myc, Ras, and Akt were sufficient to induce ovarian
tumor formation when infected cells were injected into
the recipient mice at subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or
ovarian sites. They demonstrated that the ovarian surface
epithelium is the precursor tissue for these ovarian
carcinomas, and that introduction of oncogenes causes
phenotypic changes in the ovarian surface epithelial
cells.
A mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma was
generated by infecting tv-a transgenic wild-type and p53
null mice with RCAS-PyMT (Lewis et al, 2005). Tumors
were induced in both wild-type and p53 null mice, but
only in the mice lacking an intact p53 gene the resulting
tumors were poorly differentiated, invasive, and
metastatic to the lungs. This study demonstrates that
metastasis is dependent on both the oncogene and the
absence of p53.
3.3 Use of RCAS-TVA based models to study gene
function
The lost-of-function and “knock out” techniques
are robust and practical for studying gene function in
mammalian system. The retroviral vectors have been
validated to express short hairpin RNA (shRNA) under
the control of an RNA polymerase III promoter for the
purpose of inhibiting gene expression in a sequence-
specific manner (Brummelkamp et al, 2002; Hemann et
al, 2003; Rubinson et al, 2003).
To date, RNA interference (RNAi) technique has
been incorporated successfully with the RCAS-TVA
method to study gene function in avian development.
Bron et al (2004) knocked the neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1)
receptor in chick embryos using the RCAS-RNAi
technique. They found that Sema3A-induced growth
cone was inhibited in dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
neurons. This result demonstrated the functional
knockdown of Nrp-1. Harpava and Cepko (2006)
delivered hairpins mediating RNA interference to the
Tab. 2 Cancers/tumors and oncogenes studied in murine system by RCAS-TVA approach
Cancer/tumor Oncogene Target
Breast cancer
Liver cancer
Nervous system tumors
Astrocytoma
Glioblastoma
Oligoastrocytoma
Oligodendroglioma
tumors (PNETs)
Ovarian cancer Myc, Ras, Akt Ovarian cells in culture
Ovarian cancer cell lines and tumors with
defined genetic alterations
Pancreatic cancer PyMT, Myc Pancreas in vivo Lewis et al, 2003
Orsulic et al, 2002
Xing & Orsulic, 2005
Cre
PyMT, Neu
PyMT, Myc
Ras, Akt
PDGF-B
Mammary gland in vivo
Liver parenchyma in vivo
Brain in vivo
Brain in vivo, Primary brain cell cultures
Neural progenitor cells, brain in vivo
Reference
Fisher et al, 1999
Du et al, 2006
Lewis et al, 2005
Holland & Varmus, 1998
Holland et al, 2000
Holland & Varmus, 1998; Dai et al, 2001
Dai et al, 2001
Fults et al, 2002 Primitive neuroectodermal
Myc
PDGF-B, platelet derived growth factor-b chain.
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 343
developing chick eye by RCAS viruses. They 'knocked
down' specific genes in infected areas of the retina. The
knock down persisted as the retina matured and could be
detected using in situ hybridization. Furthermore, the
amount of retinal tissue affected could be controlled by
manipulating the degree of infection.
In mammalian system, Bromberg-White et al (2004)
created a RCAS vector capable of expressing shRNA
that inhibits the expression of glyceraldehydes-3-phos-
phate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene, and reduces
GAPDH expression in cell line A375. They demonstrated
that RCAS vectors can be used to stably express shRNA
to inhibit gene expression in loss-of-function analyses of
specific genes in vitro as well as in vivo.
The RCASBP-Y vector has been modified to
incorporate “Gateway” site-specific recombination
cloning of genes into the viral construct, and will allow
for the efficient transfer and expression of cDNAs
required for functional genomic analyses in both avian
and mammalian model systems (Loftus et al, 2001).
3.4 Use of soluble TVA receptor, TVA-ligand bridge
proteins and RCAS system for gene therapy
RCAS system has been considered useful for gene
therapy of cancers (Orsulic, 2002; Xing & Orsulic, 2005).
However, gene therapy is dependant on the ability of
target cancer cells to accept the viral vectors carrying
therapeautic or suicide genes. Many TVA receptor
transgenic models have been generated in mammalian
system to accept RCAS vectors, simultaneously new
methods are developed. Several studies have indicated
that the membrane TVA receptor is not an absolute
requirement for virus infection, and RCAS vectors linked
with a soluble TVA can be delivered into
receptor-deficient cells (Snitkovsky & Young, 1998;
Damico & Bates, 2000; Contreras-Alcantara et al, 2006).
The viral receptor function of TVA is determined by a
40-residue, cysteine-rich motif called the LDL-A module,
which is highly homologous to the human low-density
lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) ligand-binding repeats
(LDL-A modules). It has been demonstrated that the
LDL-A module of TVA is necessary and sufficient to
mediate efficient EnvA binding and ASLV-A infection
(Rong & Bates, 1995). Therefore, the soluble TVA
receptor is an ideal candidate for transferring RCAS to
target cells deficient in membrane TVA.
Additionally, several proteins consisting of a TVA
receptor-ligand fusion structure have been developed to
serve as bifunctional bridge to surface receptors of target
cells and RCAS vectors (Fig. 4). The bridge proteins
contain the extracellular domain of TVA and a peptide
which can bind to surface receptors of target cells
(Orsulic, 2002). Several authors have succeeded in
infecting the mammalian cells expressing cognate
cellular receptors using the bridge proteins consisting of
the domain of epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), or heregulin (Boerger
et al, 1999; Snitkovsky et al, 2000, 2001; Snitkovsky &
Young, 1998, 2002). This method provides a flexible
way to target entry of RCAS vectors to mammalian cells.
Fig. 4 Delivery of RCAS vectors into target mammalian cells
by retroviral receptor-ligand fusion proteins
The fusion protein is comprised of the extracellular domain of TVA
fused with a ligand protein which permits it to bind to RCAS viral ENV
and to cell surface receptor respectively.
Hu et al (2007) investigated for the first time the
characteristics of RCAS as an alternative vector system
for transduction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor
cells. The new vectors were modified by replacing the
avian env gene with the gene encoding amphotropic or
ecotropic murine Env protein, which allows RCAS
vectors to infect mammalian cells efficiently (Barsov &
Hughes, 1996; Barsov et al, 2001). They used nonhuman
primate autologous transplantation models to test
whether the RCAS vectors can efficiently transduce
rhesus macaque CD34
+
hematopoietic stem and
progenitor cells. This study showed that RCAS vectors
could efficiently and stably transduce the CD34
+
hematopoietic progenitor cells with an efficiency of
transduction of up to 34% in vitro, and that highly
polyclonal hematopoietic reconstitution in myeloid and
lymphoid lineages was observed up to 18 months
post-transplantation in animals transplanted with RCAS
vector-transduced autologous CD34
+
cells. Hu et al
344 Zoological Research Vol. 29
(2007) indicated that the RCAS system should be
explored and further optimized for gene therapy
applications targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor
cells.
4 Conclusion and future research
This review shows that the RCAS-TVA based
technique is very useful and valid in various areas,
including basic biology, medicine and clinical research.
To date, a large number of RCAS vectors (and ancillary
tools, including soluble receptors, receptor-ligand fusion
proteins, mammalian cell lines expressing receptors, and
tv-a transgenic mice) have been developed for
mammalian system, and the number of mammalian
models (especially the mouse models) is constantly
increasing. These models can be used for a number of
different study purposes: gene function, development,
carcinogenesis and gene therapy.
Bioreactor is also a novel potential for the use of
RCAS-TVA system in the future. Pronuclear
microinjection is the major method today for the
production of transgenic animal bioreactor, but repeated
operation is inevitable to create different transgenic
animals producing different bioactive proteins. The
RCAS-TVA technique provides a convenient and flexible
way to produce a variety of biological products in one
transgenic animal, in which different target genes can be
introduced to the tissues or organs expressing TVA
References:
Barsov EV, Hughes SH. 1996. Gene transfer into mammalian cells by a
Rous sarcoma virus-based retroviral vector with the host range of
the amphotropic murine leukemia virus [J]. J Virol, 70: 3922-3929.
Barsov EV, Payne WS, Hughes SH. 2001. Adaptation of chimeric
retroviruses in vitro and in vivo: Isolation of avian retroviral
vectors with extended host range [J]. J Virol, 75: 4973-4983.
Barton GM, Medzhitov R. 2002. Retroviral delivery of small
interfering RNA into primary cells [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:
14943-14945.
Bates P, Young JA, Varmus HE. 1993. A receptor for subgroup a Rous
sarcoma virus is related to the low density lipoprotein receptor [J].
Cell, 74: 1043–1051.
Berberich SL, Macias M, Zhang L, Turek LP, Stoltzfus CM. 1990.
Comparison of Rous sarcoma virus RNA processing in chicken
and mouse fibroblasts: evidence for double-spliced RNA in
nonpermissive mouse cells [J]. J Virol, 64: 4313-4320.
Boerger AL, Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 1999. Retroviral vectors
preloaded with a viral receptor-ligand bridge protein are targeted to
specific cell types [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96: 9867-9872.
Boerkoel CF, Federspiel MJ, Salter DW, Payne W, Crittenden LB,
molecules simultaneously, sequentially or repeatedly. For
the objective of producing pharmaceuticals for treating
human diseases, mammary glands may be the ideal tissue
for use of the RCAS-TVA system.
The TMGT and OMGT techniques open a new
perspective in creating tv-a transgenic mammals.
Compared with the conventional pronuclear microinjec-
tion approach, use of TMGT and OMGT is much
cheaper and faster with quick and effective delivery of
genes to target tissues (Sato, 2005; Yang et al, 2007).
Therefore, the cost for the whole experiment is decreased.
The current studies demonstrate that gene knock down
can be made in vitro and in vivo by using the RCAS
system expressing RNAi. It can be predicted that the
RCAS-RNAi technique will be very useful for gene
function (or loss-of-function) studies. To improve the
infectious ability of RCAS vectors to cells absent of
mitosis, more and more vectors are being developed.
Furthermore, novel uses of the RCAS-TVA system
including infection of non-dividing somatic cells, and
neurons, are being developed in mammalian models.
On the whole, the RCAS-TVA based mammalian
model is a powerful tool for understanding the
mechanism and target treatment of human diseases. We
anticipate that new uses for the RCAS-TVA method in
mammals will be developed with a better understanding
of retroviruses, its hosts, and using other new biological
techniques.
Kung HJ, Hughes SH. 1993. A new defective retroviral vector
system based on the Bryan strain of Rous sarcoma virus [J].
Virology, 195: 669-679.
Bromberg-White JL, Webb CP, Patacsil VS, Miranti CK, Williams BO,
Holmen SL. 2004. Delivery of short hairpin RNA sequences by
using a replication-competent avian retroviral vector [J]. J Virol, 78:
4914-4916.
Bron R, Eickholt BJ, Vermeren M, Fragale N, Cohen J. 2004.
Functional knockdown of neuropilin-1 in the developing chick
nervous system by siRNA hairpins phenocopies genetic ablation in
the mouse [J]. Dev Dyn, 230: 299-308.
Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R. 2002. Stable suppression of
tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference [J]. Cancer
Cell, 2: 243-247.
Contreras-Alcantara S, Godby JA, Delos SE. 2006. The single ligand
binding repeat of TVA, a low density lipoprotein receptor related
protein, contains two ligand binding surfaces [J]. J Biol Chem, 281:
22827-22838.
Chhatwal JP, Hammack SE, Jasnow AM, Rainnie DG, Ressler KJ. 2007.
Identification of cell-type-specific promoters within the brain using
lentiviral vectors [J]. Gene Ther, 14: 575-583.
No. 3 NIU Yi-dong et al: Mammalian Models Based on RCAS-TVA Technique 345
Dai C, Celestino JC, Okada Y, Louis DN, Fuller GN, Holland EC. 2001.
PDGF autocrine stimulation dedifferentiates cultured astrocytes
and induces oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas from
neural progenitors and astrocytes in vivo [J]. Genes Dev, 15:
1913-1925.
Damico R, Bates P. 2000. Soluble receptor-induced retroviral infection
of receptor-deficient cells [J]. J Virol, 74: 6469-6475.
Doetsch F, Caillé I, Lim DA, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A.
1999. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the
adult mammalian brain [J]. Cell, 97: 703-716.
Du Z, Li Y. 2007. RCAS-TVA in the mammary gland: an in vivo
oncogene screen and a high fidelity model for breast
transformation? [J]. Cell Cycle, 6: 823-826.
Du Z, Podsypanina K, Huang S, McGrath A, Toneff MJ, Bogoslovskaia
E, Zhang X, Moraes RC, Fluck M, Craig Allred DC, Lewis MT,
Varmus HE, Li Y. 2006. Introduction of oncogenes into mammary
glands in vivo with an avian retroviral vector initiates and promotes
carcinogenesis in mouse models [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103:
17396-17401.
Dunn KJ, Incao A, Watkins-Chow D, Li Y, Pavan WJ. 2001. In utero
complementation of a neural crest-derived melanocyte defect using
cell directed gene transfer [J]. Genesis, 30: 70-76.
Dunn KJ, Williams BO, Li Y, Pavan WJ. 2000. Neural crest-directed
gene transfer demonstrates Wnt1 role in melanocyte expansion and
differentiation during mouse development [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA, 97: 10050-10055.
Federspiel MJ, Bates P, Young JAT, Varmus HE, Hughes SH. 1994. A
system for tissue-specific gene targeting: Transgenic mice
susceptible to subgroup A avian leukosis virus-based retroviral
vectors [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91: 11241-11245.
Federspiel MJ, Swing DA, Eagleson B, Reid SW, Hughes SH. 1996.
Expression of transduced genes in mice generated by infecting
blastocysts with avian leukosis virus-based retroviral vectors [J].
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93: 4931-4936.
Fisher GH, Orsulic S, Holland E, Hively WP, Li Y, Lewis BC, Williams
BO, Varmus HE. 1999. Development of a flexible and specific
gene delivery system for production of murine tumor models [J].
Oncogene, 18: 5253-5260.
Fu SL, Huang YJ, Liang FP, Huang YF, Chuang CF, Wang SW, Yao JW.
2005. Malignant transformation of an epithelial cell by v-Src via
tv-a-mediated retroviral infection: A new cell model for studying
carcinogenesis [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 338: 830-838.
Fults D, Pedone C, Dai C, Holland EC. 2002. MYC expression
promotes the proliferation of neural progenitor cells in culture and
in vivo [J]. Neoplasia,
4: 32-39.
Furuhata S, Ide H, Miura Y, Yoshida T, Aoki K. 2003. Development of
a prostate-specific promoter for gene therapy against
androgen-independent prostate cancer [J]. Mol Ther, 7: 366-374.
Godwin AK, Miller PD, Getts LA, Jakson K, Sonoda G, Schray KJ,
Testa JR, Hamilton TC. 1995. Retroviral-like sequences
specifically expressed in the rat ovary detect genetic differences
between normal and transformed rat ovarian epithelial cells [J].
Endocrinology, 136: 4640-4649.
Goldsmith ME, Short KJ, Elwood PC, Kowan KH. 1999. A
recombinant adenoviral vector with selective transgene expression
in ovarian cancer cells [J]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 40: 479.
Greger JG, Katz RA, Taganov K, Rall GF, Skalka AM. 2004.
Transduction of terminally differentiated neurons by avian sarcoma
virus [J]. J Virol, 78: 4902-4906.
Hamra FK, Gatlin J, Chapman KM, Grellhesl DM, Garcia JV, Hammer
RE, Garbers DL. 2002. Production of transgenic rats by lentiviral
transduction of male germ-line stem cells [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA, 99: 14931-14936.
Harpavat S, Cepko CL. 2006. RCAS-RNAi: a loss-of-function method
for the developing chick retina [J]. BMC Dev Biol, 6: 2
(/1471-213X/6/2).
Hatziioannou T, Goff SP. 2001. Infection of nondividing cells by Rous
sarcoma virus [J]. J Virol, 75: 9526-9531.
He X, Qi B, Liu GS, Yu WD, Chen QX. 2006. A novel method to
transfer gene in vivo system [J]. Prog Biochem Biophys, 33:
685-690.
Hemann MT, Fridman JS, Zilfou JT, Hernando E, Paddison PJ,
Cordon-Cardo C, Hannon GJ, Lowe SW. 2003. An epi-allelic
series of p53 hypomorphs created by stable RNAi produces
distinct tumor phenotypes in vivo [J]. Nat Genet, 33: 396-400.
Himly M, Foster DN, Bottoli I, Iacovoni JS, Vogt PK. 1998. The DF-1
chicken fibroblast cell line: transformation induced by diverse
oncogenes and cell death resulting from infection by avian leukosis
viruses [J]. Virology, 248: 295-304.
Holland EC, Celestino J, Dai C, Schaefer L, Sawaya RE, Fuller GN.
2000. Combined activation of Ras and Akt in neural progenitors
induces glioblastoma formation in mice [J]. Nat Genet, 25: 55-57.
Holland EC, Hively WP, DePinho RA, Varmus HE. 1998. A
constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates
with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce
glioma-like lesions in mice [J]. Genes Dev, 12: 3675-3685.
Holland EC, Varmus HE. 1998. Basic fibroblast growth factor induces
cell migration and proliferation after glia-specific gene transfer in
mice [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95: 1218-1223.
Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Dobrinski I. 2002. Germ cell
transplantation in pigs [J]. Biol Reprod, 66: 21-28.
Honaramooz A, Behboodi E, Blash S, Megee SO, Dobrinski I. 2003.
Germ cell transplantation in goats [J]. Mol Reprod Dev, 64:
422-428.
Hu J, Ferris A, Larochelle A, Krouse A, Metzger ME, Donahue RE,
Hughes SH, Dunbar CE. 2007. Transduction of rhesus macaque
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with avian sarcoma and
leukosis viral vectors [J]. Hum Gene Ther, 18: 691-700.
Hu WS, Pathak VK. 2000. Design of retroviral vectors and helper cells
for gene therapy [J]. Pharm Rev, 52: 493-512.
Hughes SH, Greenhouse JJ, Petropoulos CJ, Sutrave P. 1987. Adaptor
plasmids simplify the insertion of foreign DNA into
helper-independent retroviral vectors [J]. J Virol, 61: 3004-3012.
Hughes ST, Kosik E. 1984. Mutagenesis of the region between env and
src of the SR-A strain of Rous sarcoma virus for the purpose of
constructing helper-independent vectors [J]. Virology, 136: 89-99.
Katz RA, Greger JG, Darby K, Boimel P, Rall GF, Skalka AM. 2002.
Transduction of interphase cells by avian sarcoma virus [J]. J Virol,
76: 5422-5434.
Kawakami Y, Rodríguez-León J, Koth CM, Büscher D, Itoh T, Raya Á,
Ng JK, Esteban CR, Takahashi S, Henrique D, Schwarz MF,
Asahara H, Belmonte JCI. 2003. MKP3 mediates the cellular
response to FGF8 signalling in the vertebrate limb [J]. Nat Cell
Biol, 5: 513-519.
Korfhagen TR, Glasser SW, Wert SE, Bruno MD, Daugherty CC,
McNeish JD, Stock JL, Potter SS, Whitsett JA. 1990. Cis-acting
sequences from a human surfactant protein gene confer
pulmonary- specific gene expression in transgenic mice [J]. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 87: 6122-6126.
Kruse F, Rose SD, Swift GH, Hammer RE, MacDonald RJ. 1993. An
endocrine-specific element is an integral component of an
exocrine-specific pancreatic enhancer [J]. Genes Dev, 7: 774-786.
Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG, Spadafora
C. 1989. Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into
eggs: genetic transformation of mice [J]. Cell, 57: 717-723.
Lewis BC, Chinnasamy N, Morgan RA, Varmus HE. 2001.
Development of an avian leukosis sarcoma virus subgroup A
pseudotyped lentiviral vector [J]. J Virol, 75: 9339-9344.
Lewis BC, Klimstra DS, Socci ND, Xu S, Koutcher JA, Varmus HE.
2005. The absence of p53 promotes metastasis in a novel somatic
mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Mol Cell Biol
, 25:
1228-1237.
Lewis BC, Klimstra DS, Varmus HE. 2003. The c-myc and PyMT
oncogenes induce different tumor types in a somatic mouse model
346 Zoological Research Vol. 29
for pancreatic cancer [J]. Genes Dev, 17: 3127-3138.
Li L, Zhu J, Tu Q, Yamauchi M, Sodek J, Karsenty G, Tang J, Chen J.
2005. An in vivo model to study osteogenic gene regulation:
targeting an avian retroviral receptor (TVA) to bone with bone
sialoprotein (BSP) promoter [J]. J Bone Min Res, 20: 1403-1413.
Loftus SK, Larson DM, Watkins-Chow D, Church DM, Pavan WJ.
2001. Generation of RCAS vectors useful for functional genomic
analyses [J]. DNA Res, 8: 221-226.
Logan M, Tabin C. 1998. Targeted gene misexpression in chick limb
buds using avian replication-competent retroviruses [J]. Methods,
14: 407-420.
Lu Q, Gore M, Zhang Q, Camenisch T, Boast S, Casagranda F, Lai C,
Skinner MK, Klein R, Matsushima GK, Earp HS, Goff SP, Lemke
G. 1999. Tyro-3 family receptors are essential regulators of
mammalian spermatogenesis [J]. Nature, 398: 723-728.
Montaner S, Sodhi A, Molinolo A, Bugge TH, Sawai ET, He Y, Li Y,
Ray PE, Gutkind JS. 2003. Endothelial infection with KSHV genes
in vivo reveals that vGPCR initiates Kaposi's sarcomagenesis and
can promote the tumorigenic potential of viral latent genes [J].
Cancer Cell, 3: 23-36.
Murphy GJ, Leavitt AD. 1999. A model for studying megakaryocyte
development and biology [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96:
3065-3070.
Orsulic S. 2002. An RCAS-TVA-based approach to designer mouse
models [J]. Mam Gen, 13: 543-547.
Orsulic S, Li Y, Soslow RA, Vitale-Cross LA, Gutkind JS, Varmus HE.
2002. Induction of ovarian cancer by defined multiple genetic
changes in a mouse model system [J]. Cancer Cell, 1: 53-62.
Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. 2002. Retrovirus-mediated
modification of male germline stem cells in rats [J]. Biol Reprod,
67: 874-879.
Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. 1986. Germ-line transformation of mice [J].
Annu Rev Genet, 20: 465-499.
Pao W, Klimstra DS, Fisher GH, Varmus HE. 2003. Use of avian
retroviral vectors to introduce transcriptional regulators into
mammalian cells for analyses of tumor maintenance [J]. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA, 100: 8764-8769.
Pekarik V, Bourikas D, Miglino N, Joset P, Preiswerk S, Stoeckli ET.
2003. Screening for gene function in chicken embryo using RNAi
and electroporation [J]. Nat Biotechnol, 21: 93-96.
Petropoulos CJ, Hughes SH. 1991. Replication-competent retroviral
vectors for the transfer and expression of gene cassettes in avian
cells [J].
J Virol, 65: 3728-3737.
Petropoulos CJ, Payne W, Salter DW, Hughes SH. 1992. Using avian
retroviral vectors for gene transfer [J]. J Virol, 66: 3391-3397.
Phillips PM, Wynn PC, Sheehy PA. 2006. Successful adaptation of the
RCAS-TVA gene transfer system for use in a bovine mammary
epithelial cell culture model [J]. Mol Ther, 13: S318.
Pinto VB, Prasad S, Yewdell J, Bennink J, Hughes SH. 2000.
Restricting expression prolongs expression of foreign genes
introduced into animals by retroviruses [J]. J Virol, 74:
10202-10206.
Rong L, Bates P. 1995. Analysis of the subgroup A avian sarcoma and
leukosis virus receptor: the 40-residue, cysteine-rich, low-density
lipoprotein receptor repeat motif of Tva is sufficient to mediate
viral entry [J]. J Virol, 69: 4847-4853.
Rubinson DA, Dillon CP, Kwiatkowski A
V, Sievers C, Yang L, Kopinja
J, Rooney DL, Zhang M, Ihriq MM, McManus MT, Gertler FB,
Scott ML & van Parijs L. 2003. A lentivirus-based system to
functionally silence genes in primary mammalian cells, stem cells
and transgenic mice by RNA interference [J]. Nat Genet, 33:
401-406.
Sato M. 2005. Transgenesis via sperm [J]. J Mamm Ova Res, 22:
92-100.
Sato M, Gotoh K, Kimura M. 1999. Sperm-mediated gene transfer by
direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis [J]. Transgenics,
2: 357-369.
Sato M, Nakamura S. 2004. A novel gene transmission pattern of
exogenous DNA in offspring obtained after testis-mediated gene
transfer (TMGT) [J]. Transgenics, 4: 121-135.
Schaefer-Klein J, Givol I, Barsov EV, Whitcomb JM, VanBrocklin M,
Foster DN, Federspiel MJ, Hughes SH. 1998. The EV-O-derived
cell line DF-1 supports the efficient replication of avian
leukosis-sarcoma viruses and vectors [J]. Virology, 248: 305-311.
Snitkovsky S, Niederman TM, Carter BS, Mulligan RC, Young JAT.
2000. A TVA-single-chain antibody fusion protein mediates
specific targeting of a subgroup A avian leukosis virus vector to
cells expressing a tumor-specific form of epidermal growth factor
receptor [J]. J Virol, 74: 9540-9545.
Snitkovsky S, Niederman TM, Mulligan RC, Young JAT. 2001.
Targeting avian leukosis virus subgroup A vectors by using a
TVA-VEGF bridge protein [J]. J Virol, 75: 1571-1575.
Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 1998. Cell-specific viral targeting mediated
by a soluble retroviral receptor-ligand fusion protein [J]. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA, 95: 7063-7068.
Snitkovsky S, Young JAT. 2002. Targeting retroviral vector infection to
cells that express heregulin receptors using a TVA-heregulin bridge
protein [J]. Virology, 292: 150-155.
Soneoka Y, Cannon PM, Ramsdale EE, Griffiths JC, Romano G,
Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ. 1995. A transient three-plasmid
expression system for the production of high titer retroviral vectors
[J]. Nucl Acids Res, 23: 628-633.
Warrenfeltz S, Pavlik S, Datta S, Kraemer ET, Benigno B, McDonald
JF. 2004. Gene expression profiling of epithelial ovarian tumors
correlated with malignant potential [J]. Mol Cancer, 3: 27-45.
Wills JW, Craven RC, Achacoso JA. 1989. Creation and expression of
myristylated forms of Rous sarcoma virus gag protein in
mammalian cells [J]. J Virol, 63: 4331-4343.
Xing D, Orsulic S. 2005. A genetically defined mouse ovarian
carcinoma model for the molecular characterization of
pathway-targeted therapy and tumor resistance [J]. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA, 102: 6936-6941.
Yamashita T, Ninomiya M, Acosta PH, García-Verdugo JM, Sunabori T,
Sakaguchi M, Adachi K, Kojima T, Hirota Y, Kawase T, Araki N,
Abe K, Okano H, Sawamoto K. 2006. Subventricular zone-derived
neuroblasts migrate and differentiate into mature neurons in the
post-stroke adult striatum [J]. J Neurosci, 26: 6627-6636.
Yang SY, Wang JG, Cui HX, Sun SG, Li Q, Gu L, Hong Y, Liu PP, Liu
WQ. 2007. Efficient generation of transgenic mice by direct
intraovarian injection of plasmid DNA [J]. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun, 358: 266-271.
Young JA, Bates P, Varmus HE. 1993. Isolation of a chicken gene that
confers susceptibility to infection by subgroup A avian leukosis
and sarcoma viruses [J]. J Virol, 67: 1811-1816..