2024年2月21日发(作者:庚昊焱)
The Modes of Language
Good morning, everyone!
In our last lecture, I was talking about language as part of our semiotic system.
And today I am going to move on to another topic, that is, the modes of language. As
you may know, messages are transmitted in human language most frequently through
two primary modes: speech and writing.
Well, you know, there is also a third mode, which is not that frequently used as
speech and writing.(1)The third mode is called signing, which is used by deaf
people. But in today's lecture, we will just focus on speech and writing, and the
specific features of these two modes.
(2)In linguistics, it is commonly noted that speech is primary and writing
secondary. Linguistics take this position because all languages are spoken except
those dead languages such as Latin, which is only existent in written
children will naturally acquire the spoken version of a language if they are exposed to
it.
They acquire the spoken form of their mother tongue during the formative period of
language acquisition. (3)However, to become literate, a child will need some kind
of formal schooling in reading and writing. In many respects, we might call speech
"primary" and writing "secondary". It implies that writing has a second-class status
when compared with speech.
(4)In fact, it is more accurate to view the two modes as having different but
complementary roles. For instance, in most legal systems, while an oral contract is
legally binding, a written contract is preferred. The reason is simple—unlike speech,
writing provides a permanent record of the contract.(5)Thus, if the terms of the
contract are disputed, the written record of the contract can be consulted and
interpreted. Disputes over an oral contract will involve one person's recollection of the
contract versus another person's. (6)While writing may be the preferred mode for a
contract, in many other contexts, speech will be more appropriate. Because the most
common type of speech—face-to-face conversation—is highly interactive. This mode
is well-suited to many social contexts, such as casual conversations over lunch,
business transactions in a grocery store, discussions between students and teachers in
a classroom.
(7)And in these contexts, interactive dialogues have many advantages over
writing. For instance, individuals engaged in conversation can ask for immediate
clarification if there is a question about something said; in a letter to a friend, in
contrast, such immediacy is lacking.
(8)When speaking to one another, speakers are face to face and can therefore see
how individuals react to what is said. On the other hand, (9)writing creates
distance between writer and reader, preventing the writer from getting any immediate
reaction from the reader.
(10)Speech is oral, thus making it possible to use intonation to emphasize words or
phrased and express emotion. Of course, one might say that writing has punctuation.
Well, it can express only a small proportion of the features that intonation has.
Because speech is created "on-line," it is produced quickly and easily. This may result
in many "ungrammatical" constructions, but rarely do these rough sentences cause
miscommunications. You know, if there is a misunderstanding, it can be easily
corrected. On the contrary, (11)writing is much more deliberate. It require
planning, editing and thus taking much more time to produce on the part of the writer.
Because of all these characteristics of writing, if an individual desires a casual,
intimate encounter with a friend, he or she is more likely to meet personally than write
a letter. In this case, writing a letter to a friend might turn out to be too
course, in today's world, the highly-developed technology has made such encounters
possible with "instant messaging" over a computer or a smart phone. And if someone
wishes to have such an encounter with a friend living many miles away, then this kind
of on-line written "chat" can mimic a face-to-face conversation.(12)But because
such conversations are a hybrid of speech and writing, they still lack the intimacy and
immediacy of a face-to-face conversation.
(13)While speech and writing are often viewed as discrete modes, it is important
for us to note that there is a continuum between speech and writing.(14)While
speech is in general more interactive than writing, various kinds of spoken and written
English display various degrees of interactivity. For instance, various linguistic
markers of interactive discourse, such as first and second person pronouns,
contractions, and private verbs such as think and feel, occurred very frequently in
telephone and face-to-face conversations but less frequently in spontaneous speeches,
interviews, and broadcasts. In addition, some kinds of writing, such as academic prose
and official documents, exhibited few markers of interactive discourse, but the other
kinds of written texts, particularly personal letters, ranked higher on the scale of
interactivity than many of the spoken texts.
In other words, (15)how language is structured depends less on whether it is
spoken or written but more on how it is being used. For example, a personal letter,
even though it is written, will contain linguistic features marking interactivity because
the writer of a letter wishes to interact with the receiver of the letter.
On the other hand, in an interview, the goal is not to interact necessarily but to get
information from the person being interviewed. Therefore, though interviews are
spoken, they have fewer markers of interactivity and contain more features typically
associated with written texts.
OK, to sum up, we have been dealing with the modes of language in today's lecture.
The two most frequently used modes are speech and writing. As two different modes
of language, speech and writing have their own characteristics. Speech is a preferred
mode in many social contacts where interactivity is needed. Of course, when a formal
stable record is preferred, writing should be an appropriate mode. Finally, I have also
emphasized that there is a continuum between speech and writing. In the following
lecture, we will concentrate on the linguistic structures of language.
Thank you!
2024年2月21日发(作者:庚昊焱)
The Modes of Language
Good morning, everyone!
In our last lecture, I was talking about language as part of our semiotic system.
And today I am going to move on to another topic, that is, the modes of language. As
you may know, messages are transmitted in human language most frequently through
two primary modes: speech and writing.
Well, you know, there is also a third mode, which is not that frequently used as
speech and writing.(1)The third mode is called signing, which is used by deaf
people. But in today's lecture, we will just focus on speech and writing, and the
specific features of these two modes.
(2)In linguistics, it is commonly noted that speech is primary and writing
secondary. Linguistics take this position because all languages are spoken except
those dead languages such as Latin, which is only existent in written
children will naturally acquire the spoken version of a language if they are exposed to
it.
They acquire the spoken form of their mother tongue during the formative period of
language acquisition. (3)However, to become literate, a child will need some kind
of formal schooling in reading and writing. In many respects, we might call speech
"primary" and writing "secondary". It implies that writing has a second-class status
when compared with speech.
(4)In fact, it is more accurate to view the two modes as having different but
complementary roles. For instance, in most legal systems, while an oral contract is
legally binding, a written contract is preferred. The reason is simple—unlike speech,
writing provides a permanent record of the contract.(5)Thus, if the terms of the
contract are disputed, the written record of the contract can be consulted and
interpreted. Disputes over an oral contract will involve one person's recollection of the
contract versus another person's. (6)While writing may be the preferred mode for a
contract, in many other contexts, speech will be more appropriate. Because the most
common type of speech—face-to-face conversation—is highly interactive. This mode
is well-suited to many social contexts, such as casual conversations over lunch,
business transactions in a grocery store, discussions between students and teachers in
a classroom.
(7)And in these contexts, interactive dialogues have many advantages over
writing. For instance, individuals engaged in conversation can ask for immediate
clarification if there is a question about something said; in a letter to a friend, in
contrast, such immediacy is lacking.
(8)When speaking to one another, speakers are face to face and can therefore see
how individuals react to what is said. On the other hand, (9)writing creates
distance between writer and reader, preventing the writer from getting any immediate
reaction from the reader.
(10)Speech is oral, thus making it possible to use intonation to emphasize words or
phrased and express emotion. Of course, one might say that writing has punctuation.
Well, it can express only a small proportion of the features that intonation has.
Because speech is created "on-line," it is produced quickly and easily. This may result
in many "ungrammatical" constructions, but rarely do these rough sentences cause
miscommunications. You know, if there is a misunderstanding, it can be easily
corrected. On the contrary, (11)writing is much more deliberate. It require
planning, editing and thus taking much more time to produce on the part of the writer.
Because of all these characteristics of writing, if an individual desires a casual,
intimate encounter with a friend, he or she is more likely to meet personally than write
a letter. In this case, writing a letter to a friend might turn out to be too
course, in today's world, the highly-developed technology has made such encounters
possible with "instant messaging" over a computer or a smart phone. And if someone
wishes to have such an encounter with a friend living many miles away, then this kind
of on-line written "chat" can mimic a face-to-face conversation.(12)But because
such conversations are a hybrid of speech and writing, they still lack the intimacy and
immediacy of a face-to-face conversation.
(13)While speech and writing are often viewed as discrete modes, it is important
for us to note that there is a continuum between speech and writing.(14)While
speech is in general more interactive than writing, various kinds of spoken and written
English display various degrees of interactivity. For instance, various linguistic
markers of interactive discourse, such as first and second person pronouns,
contractions, and private verbs such as think and feel, occurred very frequently in
telephone and face-to-face conversations but less frequently in spontaneous speeches,
interviews, and broadcasts. In addition, some kinds of writing, such as academic prose
and official documents, exhibited few markers of interactive discourse, but the other
kinds of written texts, particularly personal letters, ranked higher on the scale of
interactivity than many of the spoken texts.
In other words, (15)how language is structured depends less on whether it is
spoken or written but more on how it is being used. For example, a personal letter,
even though it is written, will contain linguistic features marking interactivity because
the writer of a letter wishes to interact with the receiver of the letter.
On the other hand, in an interview, the goal is not to interact necessarily but to get
information from the person being interviewed. Therefore, though interviews are
spoken, they have fewer markers of interactivity and contain more features typically
associated with written texts.
OK, to sum up, we have been dealing with the modes of language in today's lecture.
The two most frequently used modes are speech and writing. As two different modes
of language, speech and writing have their own characteristics. Speech is a preferred
mode in many social contacts where interactivity is needed. Of course, when a formal
stable record is preferred, writing should be an appropriate mode. Finally, I have also
emphasized that there is a continuum between speech and writing. In the following
lecture, we will concentrate on the linguistic structures of language.
Thank you!