2024年4月11日发(作者：依谷芹)
Deviation List
ElementItemDeviations
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.9
1.12
1.14
1.17
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.6
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.13
1.16
2.2
The chemical inventory did not include information on chemical exposed population. 化学品清单中没有包括操作化学品的暴露人群。
There were no CAS information for all chemicals in the inventory. 化学品清单中没有包括有害物质的CAS号。
Occupational exposure limits (OEL) were not included in the chemical inventory.
化学品清单中未包含有害物质的职业暴露限值的信息。
All MSDS were not in GHS or GBZ 16483-2008 format.
该公司所获取的MSDS都不符合GB 16483-2008 或者GHS的标准。
The chemical inventory did not include information on route of exposure. 化学品清单中未包含有害物质的暴露途径。
Seaco has not conducted any bulk sampling to determine ingredients of cleaning agents and degreasers. 未执行对工艺过程中使用的
清洗剂、去脂剂、脱模剂进行成分分析检测的机制。
There was no evidence available to indicate that chemicals were reviewed and approved before introduction into Seaco. 没有证据表
明该公司有针对化学物质引进审批的表格。
Chemicals with restricted substances such as n-hexane and toluene were used in Seaco but were not acknowledged by Apple. 工厂
使用的白电油（含有正己烷成分），A/B 处理剂（含有甲苯成分），这些受限物质的信息并没有知会给Apple。
Interviewed staff responsible for developing chemical inventory was not clear on how to develop it. 制定化学品清单的人员尚不清楚应
该如何建立一个符合要求的化学品清单。
No designated person in Seaco was assigned with EHS responsibilities. The person who developed the chemical inventory did not
understand the terms such as CAS, OEL, LD 50 and LC 50. 该公司没有专职负责EHS的人员，制定化学品清单的人员不懂得MSDS
当中的专业术语，例如OEL、LD50等。
Interviewed affected employees were not able to describe the requirements and procedures for bulk sampling. 采访该公司人员，没有
人能够描述出化学品取样检测的要求和流程。
Seaco has not established a risk assessment program. 未建立系统的化学品危害评估方法，以及与之相关的工作场所职业危害因素的
采样、监测计划。
The risk assessment was not performed for all routine and non-routine operations. 公司没有化学品定性暴露评估的流程和表格。
Seaco did not use similar exposure group (SEG) strategy to perform qualitative and quantative risk assessment. 没有定义相似暴露
组
No air sampling records were available for verification. 没有采样记录
Seaco did not perform job hazard analyses on job tasks with potential chemical exposures. 该公司没有对涉及到化学品暴露的工作任
务进行工作安全分析
All field operations were not included in the scope of the risk assessment.该公司尚未建立风险评估的机制，因此在工作现场所看到的
各项工作都不包含在风险评估表中。
Severity
Minor
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Minor
Medium
Minor
Major
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.5
1.1
1.7
1.9
1.13
2.2
Interviewed staff did not know how to conduct a chemical exposure assessment. 该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工程师不清
Major
楚该如何进行化学品暴露评估。
Interviewed staff did not know how to develop an IH monitoring plan. to该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工程师不清楚该如何
Major
制定化学品监测计划。
Interviewed staff did not know how to control quality of quantitative exposure assessment. 该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工
Medium
程师不清楚该如何控制定量评估的质量。
Interviewed staff did not know how to conduct job hazard analysis. 该公司没有关于开展工作安全分析的机制，因此受访人员不清楚如
Medium
何去做工作安全分析。
There was no written engineering control program with the use of substitution, isolation, containment, and ventilation methods.公司没
Medium
有关于工程控制措施方面的管理程序。
Seaco did not perform PPE needs assessment according the hazards in workplaces. 未依照工作场所的风险，对员工使用的劳动防护
用品需求进行评估。Major
Fire fighting permit for chemical warehouse was not obtained. 危险化学品储存仓库未获得消防批文。
No evidence was available to indicate that gloves were selected according to the chemicals being handled and use patterns. 没有证
据表明该公司的防化学品手套是基于员工所操作的化学品性质而选择的合适的材质。
Field inspection found that respirators used in the chemical warehouse were not sealed, cartridges were not dated, and there was no
user name information on the respirators since multiple respirators were stored together. 现场查看料化学品仓库人员所使用的呼吸防
护用具，呼吸面罩没有密封保存，滤盒上没有标注更换日期，面罩上没有员工姓名标签。
The workers handling A/B cleaning solvents did not wear respirators. One worker was found working in the grinding and machining
area did not wear safety glasses. One worker in EDM workshop did not wear safety shoes. Approximate 20% of workers in Solid
Molding Area did not wear earplugs. 液体成型车间里面操作员使用A/B 处理剂的员工没有佩戴呼吸保护用品；
车床、磨床工作区域要求工作时佩戴安全眼镜，现场观察到一名员工在操作车床时未佩戴安全防护眼镜；EDM车间要求进入该区域应穿
安全鞋，现场观察到有一名员工并未穿安全鞋；
固态成型车间里属于噪音区，有要求佩戴防护耳塞，有部分员工并没有佩戴耳塞。
Field inspection found that chemical warehouse keeper did not know how to evaluate fitness of respirator and did not perform
positive and negative seal checks. 现场抽查仓库员工，在佩戴呼吸面罩时，没有进行正、负压测试，也不清楚该如何进行正、负压测
试。
Seaco had reports for previous incidents but no thorough investigation was conducted to determine root causes and effective
preventive measures were not developed and implemented. 该公司仅就已经发生的工伤事故进行工伤鉴定和报告，并未对发生的事故
采用科学的方法进行深入的调查，从而找出事故发生的根本原因并制定有针对性的纠正预防措施。
Major
Medium
Minor
Risk Control2.3Medium
Risk Control
Risk Control
3.5
3.7
Medium
Medium
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Training
Training
Training
Medical Surveillance
Medical Surveillance
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.1.3
2.1.7
1.3
1.10
Medical Surveillance
Medical Surveillance
Chemical Handling
1.11
2.5
1.1
Chemical Handling
Chemical Handling
1.3
1.4
Seaco did not include hazcom requirements for non-routine operations. For example, marking signs and lines on the floor during the
CMP assessment was observed and very pungent smell was present in the entire first floor, no hazards were communicated to any
affected employees. 该公司的危害沟通程序中没有涵盖当员工从事非常规工作需要操作化学品时，该如何进行危害沟通的机制。比如
在CMP评估过程中， 员工用油漆画地标线时，整个一楼气味非常刺鼻， 没有人对相关人员进行过风险沟通。
Seaco's hazcom program did not include hazcom requirements for contractors. 该公司的危害沟通程序中没有包括如何对合同商进行
危害沟通的机制。
Seaco Hazcom program did not include requirements for hazard notification requirements such as warning symbols/signs at
locations where toxic chemicals are used. 该公司的危害沟通程序中未明确关于储存和使用有毒有害化学品的场所张贴“职业危害告知”
的详细要求。
No evidence was available to indicate that chemical hazard classification was performed based on GHS or applicable GBZ
regulations. 没有证据表明该公司对于所使用的化学品依照GHS标准进行了分类。
Seaco staff with EHS responsibilities did not receive continuing education to further improve their professional expertise. 该公司没有
专职的EHS管理人员，现有的系统工程师没有接受过持续的安全教育。
Interviewed mold cleaning operators did not the PPE requirements for their tasks. 采访洗模岗位的员工，发现员工并不清楚他所从事
的工作具体要求佩戴什么样的防护用品。
受访员工表明，他并未参加过关于化学品操作方面的培训
Medical surveillance testing program did not cover all positions with exposure to occupational hazards. 未针对存在职业危害因素岗位
的所有员工执行岗前、岗中、离岗职业健康体检。
Four workers with abnormal testing results on hearing loss did not receive a follow-up testing, and one interviewed worker did not
know that a follow-up testing was needed if medical testing results were abnormal. 有四人听力体检结果异常，要求复查，实际上没有
执行。
有一名受访员工，在受访之时仍不清楚自己有体检结果异常需要复查。
The incident of left foot injury, happened on Feb. 26, 2016, was not investigated and incident investigation report was not found and
corrective actions were not developed and implemented. 2016年2月26日，固态成型车间某员工左脚压伤发生工伤事故，尚未看到事
故调查报告以及纠正预防措施。
Interviewed medical surveillance administrator did not know how to investigate occupational exposure incidents. 该公司员工不清楚该
如何调查因职业暴露而引起的事故。
No evidence was available to indicate that Seaco develped chemicla handling procedures: for example: no procedure for mold
cleaning operations and A/B glue preparation operations. 没有证据表明该公司起草了关于化学品操作方面的操作规程，洗模工作没有
操作规程，配A/B胶的工作没有操作规程。
Seaco did not have detailed requirements on PPE for chemical handling. No evidence was available to indicate that selected PPE
was appropriate for chemicals being handled. 该公司没有细化各项化学品操作时应该佩戴的劳动防护用品，没有证据表明该公司所选
用的劳动防护用品是合适的。
Seaco did not have written procedures to specify the detailed chemical handling procedure and sequence. 没有证据表明该公司起草
了关于化学品操作方面的操作规程。
Minor
Medium
Medium
Minor
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Major
Medium
Chemical Handling
Chemical Handling
Emergency
Response
Emergency
Response
Emergency
Response
2.18
3.7
1.3.1
1.8
2.3
Chemical waste storage area did not meet the requirements of GB 18597-2001. 危险化学品储存区域不满足《危险废物储存污染控制
Medium
标准》（GB18597-2001）
Seaco did not have procedures for chemical waste disposal. 该公司没有危废处置方面的操作规程。Minor
No evidence was available to indicate that visitors and contractors received instructions on emergencies. 没有证据表明该公司知会了
Medium
访客和合同商关于紧急情况下该如何应对的事宜。
Seaco did not have a detailed requirements for the layout of eyewashers. 该公司没有关于洗眼器布局的要求。Minor
Seaco did not have a defined emergency response command center, and assembly points were not defined. First aid boxes were not
inspected periodically and supplies were not replenished in a timely manner. Only one eyewasher was provided at the chemical
warehouse area， which was not inspected regularly. No eyewashers were observed at other locations. 该公司没有明确定义的应急指Medium
挥中心，紧急集合点的部门区域分布不清楚，现场查看到试模车间的急救药箱里的药品仅剩下烫伤膏和消毒棉，无人检查。仅在危险化
学品仓库看到有配备洗眼器，但该洗眼器没有定期检查的记录。
2024年4月11日发(作者：依谷芹)
Deviation List
ElementItemDeviations
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Chemical Inventory
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.9
1.12
1.14
1.17
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.6
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.13
1.16
2.2
The chemical inventory did not include information on chemical exposed population. 化学品清单中没有包括操作化学品的暴露人群。
There were no CAS information for all chemicals in the inventory. 化学品清单中没有包括有害物质的CAS号。
Occupational exposure limits (OEL) were not included in the chemical inventory.
化学品清单中未包含有害物质的职业暴露限值的信息。
All MSDS were not in GHS or GBZ 16483-2008 format.
该公司所获取的MSDS都不符合GB 16483-2008 或者GHS的标准。
The chemical inventory did not include information on route of exposure. 化学品清单中未包含有害物质的暴露途径。
Seaco has not conducted any bulk sampling to determine ingredients of cleaning agents and degreasers. 未执行对工艺过程中使用的
清洗剂、去脂剂、脱模剂进行成分分析检测的机制。
There was no evidence available to indicate that chemicals were reviewed and approved before introduction into Seaco. 没有证据表
明该公司有针对化学物质引进审批的表格。
Chemicals with restricted substances such as n-hexane and toluene were used in Seaco but were not acknowledged by Apple. 工厂
使用的白电油（含有正己烷成分），A/B 处理剂（含有甲苯成分），这些受限物质的信息并没有知会给Apple。
Interviewed staff responsible for developing chemical inventory was not clear on how to develop it. 制定化学品清单的人员尚不清楚应
该如何建立一个符合要求的化学品清单。
No designated person in Seaco was assigned with EHS responsibilities. The person who developed the chemical inventory did not
understand the terms such as CAS, OEL, LD 50 and LC 50. 该公司没有专职负责EHS的人员，制定化学品清单的人员不懂得MSDS
当中的专业术语，例如OEL、LD50等。
Interviewed affected employees were not able to describe the requirements and procedures for bulk sampling. 采访该公司人员，没有
人能够描述出化学品取样检测的要求和流程。
Seaco has not established a risk assessment program. 未建立系统的化学品危害评估方法，以及与之相关的工作场所职业危害因素的
采样、监测计划。
The risk assessment was not performed for all routine and non-routine operations. 公司没有化学品定性暴露评估的流程和表格。
Seaco did not use similar exposure group (SEG) strategy to perform qualitative and quantative risk assessment. 没有定义相似暴露
组
No air sampling records were available for verification. 没有采样记录
Seaco did not perform job hazard analyses on job tasks with potential chemical exposures. 该公司没有对涉及到化学品暴露的工作任
务进行工作安全分析
All field operations were not included in the scope of the risk assessment.该公司尚未建立风险评估的机制，因此在工作现场所看到的
各项工作都不包含在风险评估表中。
Severity
Minor
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Minor
Medium
Minor
Major
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
Risk Control
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.5
1.1
1.7
1.9
1.13
2.2
Interviewed staff did not know how to conduct a chemical exposure assessment. 该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工程师不清
Major
楚该如何进行化学品暴露评估。
Interviewed staff did not know how to develop an IH monitoring plan. to该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工程师不清楚该如何
Major
制定化学品监测计划。
Interviewed staff did not know how to control quality of quantitative exposure assessment. 该公司没有专职的EHS人员，受访的系统工
Medium
程师不清楚该如何控制定量评估的质量。
Interviewed staff did not know how to conduct job hazard analysis. 该公司没有关于开展工作安全分析的机制，因此受访人员不清楚如
Medium
何去做工作安全分析。
There was no written engineering control program with the use of substitution, isolation, containment, and ventilation methods.公司没
Medium
有关于工程控制措施方面的管理程序。
Seaco did not perform PPE needs assessment according the hazards in workplaces. 未依照工作场所的风险，对员工使用的劳动防护
用品需求进行评估。Major
Fire fighting permit for chemical warehouse was not obtained. 危险化学品储存仓库未获得消防批文。
No evidence was available to indicate that gloves were selected according to the chemicals being handled and use patterns. 没有证
据表明该公司的防化学品手套是基于员工所操作的化学品性质而选择的合适的材质。
Field inspection found that respirators used in the chemical warehouse were not sealed, cartridges were not dated, and there was no
user name information on the respirators since multiple respirators were stored together. 现场查看料化学品仓库人员所使用的呼吸防
护用具，呼吸面罩没有密封保存，滤盒上没有标注更换日期，面罩上没有员工姓名标签。
The workers handling A/B cleaning solvents did not wear respirators. One worker was found working in the grinding and machining
area did not wear safety glasses. One worker in EDM workshop did not wear safety shoes. Approximate 20% of workers in Solid
Molding Area did not wear earplugs. 液体成型车间里面操作员使用A/B 处理剂的员工没有佩戴呼吸保护用品；
车床、磨床工作区域要求工作时佩戴安全眼镜，现场观察到一名员工在操作车床时未佩戴安全防护眼镜；EDM车间要求进入该区域应穿
安全鞋，现场观察到有一名员工并未穿安全鞋；
固态成型车间里属于噪音区，有要求佩戴防护耳塞，有部分员工并没有佩戴耳塞。
Field inspection found that chemical warehouse keeper did not know how to evaluate fitness of respirator and did not perform
positive and negative seal checks. 现场抽查仓库员工，在佩戴呼吸面罩时，没有进行正、负压测试，也不清楚该如何进行正、负压测
试。
Seaco had reports for previous incidents but no thorough investigation was conducted to determine root causes and effective
preventive measures were not developed and implemented. 该公司仅就已经发生的工伤事故进行工伤鉴定和报告，并未对发生的事故
采用科学的方法进行深入的调查，从而找出事故发生的根本原因并制定有针对性的纠正预防措施。
Major
Medium
Minor
Risk Control2.3Medium
Risk Control
Risk Control
3.5
3.7
Medium
Medium
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Hazard
Communication
Training
Training
Training
Medical Surveillance
Medical Surveillance
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.1.3
2.1.7
1.3
1.10
Medical Surveillance
Medical Surveillance
Chemical Handling
1.11
2.5
1.1
Chemical Handling
Chemical Handling
1.3
1.4
Seaco did not include hazcom requirements for non-routine operations. For example, marking signs and lines on the floor during the
CMP assessment was observed and very pungent smell was present in the entire first floor, no hazards were communicated to any
affected employees. 该公司的危害沟通程序中没有涵盖当员工从事非常规工作需要操作化学品时，该如何进行危害沟通的机制。比如
在CMP评估过程中， 员工用油漆画地标线时，整个一楼气味非常刺鼻， 没有人对相关人员进行过风险沟通。
Seaco's hazcom program did not include hazcom requirements for contractors. 该公司的危害沟通程序中没有包括如何对合同商进行
危害沟通的机制。
Seaco Hazcom program did not include requirements for hazard notification requirements such as warning symbols/signs at
locations where toxic chemicals are used. 该公司的危害沟通程序中未明确关于储存和使用有毒有害化学品的场所张贴“职业危害告知”
的详细要求。
No evidence was available to indicate that chemical hazard classification was performed based on GHS or applicable GBZ
regulations. 没有证据表明该公司对于所使用的化学品依照GHS标准进行了分类。
Seaco staff with EHS responsibilities did not receive continuing education to further improve their professional expertise. 该公司没有
专职的EHS管理人员，现有的系统工程师没有接受过持续的安全教育。
Interviewed mold cleaning operators did not the PPE requirements for their tasks. 采访洗模岗位的员工，发现员工并不清楚他所从事
的工作具体要求佩戴什么样的防护用品。
受访员工表明，他并未参加过关于化学品操作方面的培训
Medical surveillance testing program did not cover all positions with exposure to occupational hazards. 未针对存在职业危害因素岗位
的所有员工执行岗前、岗中、离岗职业健康体检。
Four workers with abnormal testing results on hearing loss did not receive a follow-up testing, and one interviewed worker did not
know that a follow-up testing was needed if medical testing results were abnormal. 有四人听力体检结果异常，要求复查，实际上没有
执行。
有一名受访员工，在受访之时仍不清楚自己有体检结果异常需要复查。
The incident of left foot injury, happened on Feb. 26, 2016, was not investigated and incident investigation report was not found and
corrective actions were not developed and implemented. 2016年2月26日，固态成型车间某员工左脚压伤发生工伤事故，尚未看到事
故调查报告以及纠正预防措施。
Interviewed medical surveillance administrator did not know how to investigate occupational exposure incidents. 该公司员工不清楚该
如何调查因职业暴露而引起的事故。
No evidence was available to indicate that Seaco develped chemicla handling procedures: for example: no procedure for mold
cleaning operations and A/B glue preparation operations. 没有证据表明该公司起草了关于化学品操作方面的操作规程，洗模工作没有
操作规程，配A/B胶的工作没有操作规程。
Seaco did not have detailed requirements on PPE for chemical handling. No evidence was available to indicate that selected PPE
was appropriate for chemicals being handled. 该公司没有细化各项化学品操作时应该佩戴的劳动防护用品，没有证据表明该公司所选
用的劳动防护用品是合适的。
Seaco did not have written procedures to specify the detailed chemical handling procedure and sequence. 没有证据表明该公司起草
了关于化学品操作方面的操作规程。
Minor
Medium
Medium
Minor
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Major
Medium
Chemical Handling
Chemical Handling
Emergency
Response
Emergency
Response
Emergency
Response
2.18
3.7
1.3.1
1.8
2.3
Chemical waste storage area did not meet the requirements of GB 18597-2001. 危险化学品储存区域不满足《危险废物储存污染控制
Medium
标准》（GB18597-2001）
Seaco did not have procedures for chemical waste disposal. 该公司没有危废处置方面的操作规程。Minor
No evidence was available to indicate that visitors and contractors received instructions on emergencies. 没有证据表明该公司知会了
Medium
访客和合同商关于紧急情况下该如何应对的事宜。
Seaco did not have a detailed requirements for the layout of eyewashers. 该公司没有关于洗眼器布局的要求。Minor
Seaco did not have a defined emergency response command center, and assembly points were not defined. First aid boxes were not
inspected periodically and supplies were not replenished in a timely manner. Only one eyewasher was provided at the chemical
warehouse area， which was not inspected regularly. No eyewashers were observed at other locations. 该公司没有明确定义的应急指Medium
挥中心，紧急集合点的部门区域分布不清楚，现场查看到试模车间的急救药箱里的药品仅剩下烫伤膏和消毒棉，无人检查。仅在危险化
学品仓库看到有配备洗眼器，但该洗眼器没有定期检查的记录。