最新消息: USBMI致力于为网友们分享Windows、安卓、IOS等主流手机系统相关的资讯以及评测、同时提供相关教程、应用、软件下载等服务。

摩托罗拉供应商评估表

IT圈 admin 28浏览 0评论

2024年5月21日发(作者:眭依琴)

Supplier Self Assessment Guidelines

The supplier shall identify a single point of contact to serve as the

overall champion responsible for compiling information from each

individual section of the capability mapping.

The supplier shall identify section champions for each section who will

be responsible for ensuring all questions are answered thoroughly and

accurately.

Each question of the capability mapping must be reviewed and scored prior

to returning to Motorola. Strengths/Opportunities/Notes section to be

fully utilized to support the score and to provide future action plans

Any question, the supplier scores as a “4” should be assumed

to be a “best practice” or “best-in-class”.

All questions scored as a “4” require following from the

supplier

An explanation that describes the supplier’s compliance with

the “4” score

Evidence in the form of documentation, records, charts,

etc. are required to support a score of “4” and must

be shown prior to the assessment team leaving the supplier

facility.

The overall supplier champion will collect and review the

self-assessment information from each of the supplier’s section

champions.

The overall supplier champion will serve as Motorola’s single point

of contact for further discussion on any issues raised with the

self-assessment response.

The overall supplier champion will be responsible for ensuring that the

self-assessment is completed in the time allotted by Motorola.

A soft copy of the Capability Mapping form is available that can be opened

in Microsoft Word. Check boxes can be checked automatically by double

clicking. Supporting statements can be typed directly into the text

boxes. The completed form must be emailed back to the Motorola team

leader in the same format as sent.

6.0

7.0

Date: Supplier Name:

Quality System

Quality Management

0 No reviews with management occur

2 Irregular reviews of quality metrics including field returns with management

occur with some coverage of cycle time and on time deliveries

4 Regular reviews of quality metrics including field returns with management occur

with coverage of metrics and actions plans for improvement of cycle time, on time

delivery, and internal assessments.

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

ISO9001 or ISO9002 or QS9000

0 Has no plans, no accreditation

1 Working towards approval

2 Evaluation date confirmed and registrar identified

3 Approved or meets the requirements of ISO9001/ISO9002/QS9000 and has been

accredited for less than 3 years, last external audit available with corrective

actions

4 Approved or meets the requirements of ISO9001/ISO9002/QS9000 and has been

accredited for 3 or more years, last external audit available with corrective

actions

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

Internal Auditing of Quality Procedure System

0 No internal auditing exists

1 Auditing occurs, but there is no formal procedure

2 A formal procedure exists and is deployed

3 A formal procedure exists, audits are routinely scheduled and deployed,

corrective actions taken and results evident

4 A formal procedure exists, audits are routinely scheduled and deployed,

corrective actions taken and results are achieved and reviewed with senior

management

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

2024年5月21日发(作者:眭依琴)

Supplier Self Assessment Guidelines

The supplier shall identify a single point of contact to serve as the

overall champion responsible for compiling information from each

individual section of the capability mapping.

The supplier shall identify section champions for each section who will

be responsible for ensuring all questions are answered thoroughly and

accurately.

Each question of the capability mapping must be reviewed and scored prior

to returning to Motorola. Strengths/Opportunities/Notes section to be

fully utilized to support the score and to provide future action plans

Any question, the supplier scores as a “4” should be assumed

to be a “best practice” or “best-in-class”.

All questions scored as a “4” require following from the

supplier

An explanation that describes the supplier’s compliance with

the “4” score

Evidence in the form of documentation, records, charts,

etc. are required to support a score of “4” and must

be shown prior to the assessment team leaving the supplier

facility.

The overall supplier champion will collect and review the

self-assessment information from each of the supplier’s section

champions.

The overall supplier champion will serve as Motorola’s single point

of contact for further discussion on any issues raised with the

self-assessment response.

The overall supplier champion will be responsible for ensuring that the

self-assessment is completed in the time allotted by Motorola.

A soft copy of the Capability Mapping form is available that can be opened

in Microsoft Word. Check boxes can be checked automatically by double

clicking. Supporting statements can be typed directly into the text

boxes. The completed form must be emailed back to the Motorola team

leader in the same format as sent.

6.0

7.0

Date: Supplier Name:

Quality System

Quality Management

0 No reviews with management occur

2 Irregular reviews of quality metrics including field returns with management

occur with some coverage of cycle time and on time deliveries

4 Regular reviews of quality metrics including field returns with management occur

with coverage of metrics and actions plans for improvement of cycle time, on time

delivery, and internal assessments.

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

ISO9001 or ISO9002 or QS9000

0 Has no plans, no accreditation

1 Working towards approval

2 Evaluation date confirmed and registrar identified

3 Approved or meets the requirements of ISO9001/ISO9002/QS9000 and has been

accredited for less than 3 years, last external audit available with corrective

actions

4 Approved or meets the requirements of ISO9001/ISO9002/QS9000 and has been

accredited for 3 or more years, last external audit available with corrective

actions

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

Internal Auditing of Quality Procedure System

0 No internal auditing exists

1 Auditing occurs, but there is no formal procedure

2 A formal procedure exists and is deployed

3 A formal procedure exists, audits are routinely scheduled and deployed,

corrective actions taken and results evident

4 A formal procedure exists, audits are routinely scheduled and deployed,

corrective actions taken and results are achieved and reviewed with senior

management

Strengths/ Opportunities/ Notes:

发布评论

评论列表 (0)

  1. 暂无评论